pg.ddx.io pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archivehelp / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Jeremy Harris <jgh@wizmail.org>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Choice of bitmap scan over index scan
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 21:53:37 -0500
Message-ID: <603c8f071001101853p6dd9517bofb7fcef43c97d79e@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B49DE7F.8080808@wizmail.org>
References: <d4468d971001100428v30236b55nb4cc82d216c7819e@mail.gmail.com>
<4B49DE7F.8080808@wizmail.org>
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Jeremy Harris <jgh@wizmail.org> wrote:
> On 01/10/2010 12:28 PM, Mathieu De Zutter wrote:
>>
>> Sort (cost=481763.31..485634.61 rows=1548520 width=338) (actual
>> time=5423.628..6286.148 rows=1551923 loops=1)
>> Sort Key: event_timestamp
>
> > Sort Method: external merge Disk: 90488kB
>>
>> -> Seq Scan on log_event (cost=0.00..79085.92 rows=1548520 width=338)
>> (actual time=0.022..2195.527 rows=1551923 loops=1)
>> Filter: (event_timestamp > (now() - '1 year'::interval))
>> Total runtime: 6407.377 ms
>
> Needing to use an external (on-disk) sort method, when taking
> only 90MB, looks odd.
>
> - Jeremy
Well, you'd need to have work_mem > 90 MB for that not to happen, and
very few people can afford to set that setting that high. If you have
a query with three or four sorts using 90 MB a piece, and five or ten
users running them, you can quickly kill the box...
...Robert
view thread (14+ messages) latest in thread
Message-ID: <603c8f071001101853p6dd9517bofb7fcef43c97d79e@mail.gmail.com> Permalink: ../603c8f071001101853p6dd9517bofb7fcef43c97d79e@mail.gmail.com/ Also on: postgresql.org/message-id/603c8f071001101853p6dd9517bofb7fcef43c97d79e@mail.gmail.com ·
reply
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options: reply via email To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Cc: robertmhaas@gmail.com, jgh@wizmail.org Subject: Re: Choice of bitmap scan over index scan In-Reply-To: <603c8f071001101853p6dd9517bofb7fcef43c97d79e@mail.gmail.com> * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox