From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: decibel <decibel@decibel.org>
Cc: psql performance list <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [PERFORMANCE] work_mem vs temp files issue
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 14:07:37 -0500
Message-ID: <603c8f071001111107v75276375g4d626dfc0efd8dc4@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3073cc9b1001111015t3888cbbex7171d61b952218da@mail.gmail.com>
References: <3073cc9b0908191745o3dc63d95q6b9308ef5bd199f2@mail.gmail.com>
<B43373EF-4CFC-4643-AB6E-5BC0D4A7EB58@decibel.org>
<25315.1252881420@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<3073cc9b1001111015t3888cbbex7171d61b952218da@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Jaime Casanova
<jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>
>> It might be useful to turn on trace_sort to see if the small files
>> are coming from sorts. If they're from hashes I'm afraid there's
>> no handy instrumentation ...
>>
>
> yes they are, this is the log (i deleted the STATEMENT lines because
> they were redundant), seems like all the temp files are used to
> execute the same sentence...
>
> BTW, this is my laptop no the server.
I think maybe there was supposed to be an attachment here?
...Robert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: robertmhaas@gmail.com, jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, decibel@decibel.org
Subject: Re: [PERFORMANCE] work_mem vs temp files issue
In-Reply-To: <603c8f071001111107v75276375g4d626dfc0efd8dc4@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox