pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: When to do a vacuum for highly active table
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 18:05:38 -0400
Message-ID: <6064tn6pxp.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com> (raw)
References: <20050830211356.48138.qmail@web31606.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

thing@m-bass.com (Markus Benne) writes:
> We have a highly active table that has virtually all
> entries updated every 5 minutes.  Typical size of the
> table is 50,000 entries, and entries have grown fat.
>
> We are currently vaccuming hourly, and towards the end
> of the hour we are seeing degradation, when compared
> to the top of the hour.

You're not vacuuming the table nearly often enough.

You should vacuum this table every five minutes, and possibly more
often than that.

[We have some tables like that, albeit smaller than 50K entries, which
we vacuum once per minute in production...]

> We are thinking of splitting the table in two: the part the updates
> often, and the part the updates infrequently as we suspect that
> record size impacts vacuum.

There's *some* merit to that.

You might discover that there's a "hot spot" that needs to be vacuumed
once per minute.

But it may be simpler to just hit the table with a vacuum once every
few minutes even though some tuples are seldom updated.
-- 
output = reverse("gro.gultn" "@" "enworbbc")
http://cbbrowne.com/info/spreadsheets.html
Signs  of  a  Klingon  Programmer #3:  "By   filing this  TPR you have
challenged the honor of my family. Prepare to die!"



view thread (7+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <6064tn6pxp.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com>
Permalink:  ../6064tn6pxp.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/6064tn6pxp.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: cbbrowne@acm.org
  Subject: Re: When to do a vacuum for highly active table
  In-Reply-To: <6064tn6pxp.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox