pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Autovacuum / full vacuum
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 11:54:21 -0500
Message-ID: <60d5ipcw8y.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com> (raw)
References: <dqigaf$1b98$1@news.hub.org>
	<20060117145649.GE21092@phlogiston.dyndns.org>
	<608xteerfh.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com>
	<20060117173046.GA4296@surnet.cl>
	<604q42elzl.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com>
	<20592.1137526372@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<034701c61c46$f427df20$f20214ac@bite.lt>

mind@bi.lt ("Mindaugas") writes:
>> >> Even a database-wide vacuum does not take locks on more than one
>> >> table.  The table locks are acquired and released one by one, as
>> >> the operation proceeds.
>> 
>> > Has that changed recently?  I have always seen "vacuumdb" or SQL
>> > "VACUUM" (without table specifications) running as one long
>> > transaction which doesn't release the locks that it is granted
>> > until the end of the transaction.
>> 
>> You sure?  It's not supposed to, and watching a database-wide
>> vacuum with "select * from pg_locks" doesn't look to me like it
>> ever has locks on more than one table (plus the table's indexes and
>> toast table).
>
>   Are there some plans to remove vacuum altogether?

I don't see that on the TODO list...

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs.TODO.html

To the contrary, there is a whole section on what functionality to
*ADD* to VACUUM.
-- 
let name="cbbrowne" and tld="acm.org" in String.concat "@" [name;tld];;
http://www.ntlug.org/~cbbrowne/finances.html
"There are two types of hackers working on Linux: those who can spell,
and those who can't.  There  is a constant, pitched battle between the
two  camps."  
--Russ Nelson (Linux Kernel Summary, Ver. 1.1.75 -> 1.1.76)



view thread (39+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <60d5ipcw8y.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com>
Permalink:  ../60d5ipcw8y.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/60d5ipcw8y.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: cbbrowne@acm.org
  Subject: Re: Autovacuum / full vacuum
  In-Reply-To: <60d5ipcw8y.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox