pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Sun Fire T2000 and PostgreSQL 8.1.3
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2006 18:12:43 -0400
Message-ID: <60fykrn02s.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com> (raw)
References: <7583B3F1891CC0429FA4A44952AA539C66FA6D@wfm-exchprd2.wfm.pvt>
	<200604051501.40109.josh@agliodbs.com>

josh@agliodbs.com (Josh Berkus) writes:
> Juan,
>
>> When I hit
>> this pgsql on this laptop with a large query I can see the load spike up
>> really high on both of my virtual processors.  Whatever, pgsql is doing
>> it looks like both cpu's are being used indepently. 
>
> Nope, sorry, you're being decieved.   Postgres is strictly one process, one 
> query.  

It's not entirely deception; there is indeed independent use of both
CPUs, it's just that it isn't from multithreading...
-- 
output = reverse("gro.mca" "@" "enworbbc")
http://www.ntlug.org/~cbbrowne/internet.html
"Don't use C; In  my opinion, C is  a library programming language not
an  app programming language."   --   Owen  Taylor  (GTK+  and   ORBit
developer)



view thread (37+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <60fykrn02s.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com>
Permalink:  ../60fykrn02s.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/60fykrn02s.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: cbbrowne@acm.org
  Subject: Re: Sun Fire T2000 and PostgreSQL 8.1.3
  In-Reply-To: <60fykrn02s.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox