pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nagaraj Raj <nagaraj.sf@yahoo.com>
To: Mike Sofen <msofen@runbox.com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Partition column should be part of PK
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2021 03:32:46 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <613808845.2913413.1625801566230@mail.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <080901d7744e$ac0f3d70$042db850$@runbox.com>
References: <20210708221703.GA1301@telsasoft.com>
	<202107082228.obnak7c7mx4n@alvherre.pgsql>
	<080901d7744e$ac0f3d70$042db850$@runbox.com>

My apologies for making confusion with new thread. Yes its same issue related to earlier post.
I was trying to figure out  how to ensure unique values for columns (billing_account_guid, ban). If i add partition key to constraint , it wont be possible what im looking for.
My use case as below 
INSERT INTO t1 SELECT * from t2 ON CONFLICT (billing_account_guid,ban) DO UPDATE SET something…

Or
INSERT INTO t1 SELECT * from t2 ON CONFLICT constraint (pk or uk)(billing_account_guid,ban) DO UPDATE SET something…

Thanks

Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone


On Thursday, July 8, 2021, 7:12 PM, Mike Sofen <msofen@runbox.com> wrote:

I believe this thread qualifies for the funniest thread of 2021 (so far).  And yes, this is a top post.  :-)

Mike Sofen

-----Original Message-----
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> 
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2021 3:29 PM
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Cc: Nagaraj Raj <nagaraj.sf@yahoo.com>; pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Partition column should be part of PK

On 2021-Jul-08, Justin Pryzby wrote:

> If I'm not wrong, this is the same thing you asked 2 week ago.
> 
> If so, why not continue the conversation on the same thread, and why 
> not reference the old thread ?
> 
> I went to the effort to find the old conversation.
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20210625042228.GJ29179@telsasoft
> .com

Actually, it looks like you're replying to the same email you replied to two weeks ago.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera              Valdivia, Chile  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/

view thread (13+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <613808845.2913413.1625801566230@mail.yahoo.com>
Permalink:  ../613808845.2913413.1625801566230@mail.yahoo.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/613808845.2913413.1625801566230@mail.yahoo.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: nagaraj.sf@yahoo.com, msofen@runbox.com, alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org, pryzby@telsasoft.com
  Subject: Re: Partition column should be part of PK
  In-Reply-To: <613808845.2913413.1625801566230@mail.yahoo.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox