pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brendan Duddridge <brendan@clickspace.com>
To: Jim C. Nasby <jnasby@pervasive.com>
Cc: Eric Lam <elam@lisasoft.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Slow restoration question
Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 12:40:43 -0600
Message-ID: <622925BE-A31E-42FD-AF6A-68DDF3B4A1B7@clickspace.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060502171617.GZ97354@pervasive.com>
References: <444F24E9.2010907@lisasoft.com>
	<20060502171617.GZ97354@pervasive.com>

Everyone here always says that RAID 5 isn't good for Postgres. We  
have an Apple Xserve RAID configured with RAID 5. We chose RAID 5  
because Apple said their Xserve RAID was "optimized" for RAID 5. Not  
sure if we made the right decision though. They give an option for  
formatting as RAID 0+1. Is that the same as RAID 10 that everyone  
talks about? Or is it the reverse?

Thanks,

____________________________________________________________________
Brendan Duddridge | CTO | 403-277-5591 x24 |  brendan@clickspace.com

ClickSpace Interactive Inc.
Suite L100, 239 - 10th Ave. SE
Calgary, AB  T2G 0V9

http://www.clickspace.com

On May 2, 2006, at 11:16 AM, Jim C. Nasby wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 05:14:41PM +0930, Eric Lam wrote:
>> all dumpfiles total about 17Gb. It has been running for 50ish hrs  
>> and up
>> to about the fourth file (5-6 ish Gb) and this is on a raid 5 server.
>
> RAID5 generally doesn't bode too well for performance; that could be
> part of the issue.
> -- 
> Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby@pervasive.com
> Pervasive Software      http://pervasive.com    work: 512-231-6117
> vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf       cell: 512-569-9461
>
> ---------------------------(end of  
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>
>                http://archives.postgresql.org
>





view thread (23+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <622925BE-A31E-42FD-AF6A-68DDF3B4A1B7@clickspace.com>
Permalink:  ../622925BE-A31E-42FD-AF6A-68DDF3B4A1B7@clickspace.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/622925BE-A31E-42FD-AF6A-68DDF3B4A1B7@clickspace.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: brendan@clickspace.com, jnasby@pervasive.com, elam@lisasoft.com
  Subject: Re: Slow restoration question
  In-Reply-To: <622925BE-A31E-42FD-AF6A-68DDF3B4A1B7@clickspace.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox