From: Mkrtchyan, Tigran <tigran.mkrtchyan@desy.de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: pgsql-performance <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: 9.5alpha1 vs 9.4
Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2015 19:16:24 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <63195233.2993923.1436116584403.JavaMail.zimbra@desy.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <10845.1436106805@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <1897514812.2949286.1436094651680.JavaMail.zimbra@desy.de>
<20150705125403.GD24494@alap3.anarazel.de>
<10845.1436106805@sss.pgh.pa.us>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-performance>
Thanks for the hin. My bad. The backup db and 9.5 had a different type on
one of the foreign-key constrains char(36) vs varchar(36).
The schema was screwed couple of days ago, byt performance numbers I checked only
after migration to 9.5.
Sorry for the noise.
Tigran.
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
> To: "Andres Freund" <andres@anarazel.de>
> Cc: "Mkrtchyan, Tigran" <tigran.mkrtchyan@desy.de>, "pgsql-performance" <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
> Sent: Sunday, July 5, 2015 4:33:25 PM
> Subject: Re: [PERFORM] 9.5alpha1 vs 9.4
> Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
>> On 2015-07-05 13:10:51 +0200, Mkrtchyan, Tigran wrote:
>>> today I have update my test system to 9.5alpha1.
>>> Most of the operations are ok, except delete.
>>> I get ~1000 times slower!
>
>>> 255.88 | 566.11 | 452 | DELETE FROM t_inodes WHERE ipnfsid=$1 AND
>>> inlink = ?
>
>> That certainly should not be the case. Could you show the query plan for
>> this statement in both versions?
>
> EXPLAIN ANALYZE, please. I'm wondering about a missing index on some
> foreign-key-involved column. That would show up as excessive time in
> the relevant trigger ...
>
> regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: tigran.mkrtchyan@desy.de, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, andres@anarazel.de
Subject: Re: 9.5alpha1 vs 9.4
In-Reply-To: <63195233.2993923.1436116584403.JavaMail.zimbra@desy.de>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox