pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Different plan for very similar queries
Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 12:22:32 -0400
Message-ID: <633.1433089352@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <556B3160.2010706@2ndquadrant.com>
References: <20150529085544.GA15813@hjp.at>
	<20150529095117.GB15813@hjp.at>
	<5568FAA5.3080807@2ndquadrant.com>
	<29819.1433012674@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<20150531110010.GA25173@hjp.at>
	<556B3160.2010706@2ndquadrant.com>
List-Unsubscribe:  <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-performance>

Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 05/31/15 13:00, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
>> (There was no analyze on facttable_stat_fta4 (automatic or manual) on
>> facttable_stat_fta4 between those two tests, so the statistics on
>> facttable_stat_fta4 shouldn't have changed - only those for term.)

> So maybe there was autoanalyze, because otherwise it really should be 
> the same in both plans ...

No, because that's the inside of a nestloop with significantly different
outer-side rowcount estimates.  The first case gets a benefit from the
expectation that it will be re-executed many times (see the impact of
loop_count on cost_index).

			regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance



view thread (10+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <633.1433089352@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../633.1433089352@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/633.1433089352@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com
  Subject: Re: Different plan for very similar queries
  In-Reply-To: <633.1433089352@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox