pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tadipathri Raghu <traghu.dba@gmail.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Why Wal_buffer is 64KB
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 20:31:18 +0530
Message-ID: <645d9d71003250801o246439a0j93c7b568786e98de@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

Hi All,

Can anybody clarify on this, why wal_buffer is 64kb and what is advantages
and disadvantages in increasing or decreasing the wal_buffer.

Regards
Raghav

view thread (11+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <645d9d71003250801o246439a0j93c7b568786e98de@mail.gmail.com>
Permalink:  ../645d9d71003250801o246439a0j93c7b568786e98de@mail.gmail.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/645d9d71003250801o246439a0j93c7b568786e98de@mail.gmail.com

 · 

reply
Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: traghu.dba@gmail.com
  Subject: Re: Why Wal_buffer is 64KB
  In-Reply-To: <645d9d71003250801o246439a0j93c7b568786e98de@mail.gmail.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox