pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org>
Cc: sfrost@snowman.net
Cc: tcapobianco@prospectiv.com
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Oracle v. Postgres 9.0 query performance
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 22:25:24 -0400
Message-ID: <6665.1307672724@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110610.112143.168304625710382767.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp>
References: <10260.1307547185@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<1307547634.1990.26.camel@tony1.localdomain>
	<20110608155159.GA18128@tamriel.snowman.net>
	<20110610.112143.168304625710382767.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp>

Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org> writes:
> Just out of curiosity, is there any chance that this kind of query is
> speeding up in 9.1 because of following changes?

>      * Allow FULL OUTER JOIN to be implemented as a hash join, and allow
>        either side of a LEFT OUTER JOIN or RIGHT OUTER JOIN to be hashed
>        (Tom Lane)

The given query wasn't an outer join, so this wouldn't affect it.

			regards, tom lane



view thread (18+ messages)

Message-ID: <6665.1307672724@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../6665.1307672724@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/6665.1307672724@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, ishii@postgresql.org, sfrost@snowman.net, tcapobianco@prospectiv.com
  Subject: Re: Oracle v. Postgres 9.0 query performance
  In-Reply-To: <6665.1307672724@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox