From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Shoaib Mir <shoaibmir@gmail.com>
Cc: Guy Rouillier <guyr-ml1@burntmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Performance <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: High update activity, PostgreSQL vs BigDBMS
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 09:56:54 -0500
Message-ID: <6903.1167317814@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bf54be870612280106n1247520dtb48e10cb4bdc43e9@mail.gmail.com>
References: <45935A49.6080602@burntmail.com>
<bf54be870612280106n1247520dtb48e10cb4bdc43e9@mail.gmail.com>
"Shoaib Mir" <shoaibmir@gmail.com> writes:
> Here are my few recommendations that might help you:
> [ snip good advice ]
Another thing to look at is whether you are doing inserts/updates as
individual transactions, and if so see if you can "batch" them to
reduce the per-transaction overhead.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, shoaibmir@gmail.com, guyr-ml1@burntmail.com
Subject: Re: High update activity, PostgreSQL vs BigDBMS
In-Reply-To: <6903.1167317814@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox