From: Ron <rjpeace@earthlink.net>
To: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: partitioning and locking problems
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 17:22:22 -0500
Message-ID: <7.0.1.0.2.20060207171933.037eee98@earthlink.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1139350142.1258.174.camel@localhost.localdomain>
References: <2BCEB9A37A4D354AA276774EE13FB8C2BCC2A6@mailserver.sandvine.com>
<1139350142.1258.174.camel@localhost.localdomain>
At 05:09 PM 2/7/2006, Simon Riggs wrote:
>I'd be disinclined to using the locking system as a scheduling tool.
I Agree with Simon. Using the locking system for scheduling feels
like a form of Programming by Side Effect.
Ron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: rjpeace@earthlink.net, simon@2ndquadrant.com
Subject: Re: partitioning and locking problems
In-Reply-To: <7.0.1.0.2.20060207171933.037eee98@earthlink.net>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox