pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dawid Kuroczko <qnex42@gmail.com>
To: Jeffrey W. Baker <jwbaker@acm.org>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: JFS fastest filesystem for PostgreSQL?
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 10:03:10 +0200
Message-ID: <758d5e7f05071401034665841c@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1121322821.6719.0.camel@noodles>
References: <1121322821.6719.0.camel@noodles>

On 7/14/05, Jeffrey W. Baker <jwbaker@acm.org> wrote:
> [reposted due to delivery error -jwb]
> 
> I just took delivery of a new system, and used the opportunity to
> benchmark postgresql 8.0 performance on various filesystems.  The system
> in question runs Linux 2.6.12, has one CPU and 1GB of system memory, and
> 5 7200RPM SATA disks attached to an Areca hardware RAID controller
> having 128MB of cache.  The caches are all write-back.
> 
> I ran pgbench with a scale factor of 1000 and a total of 100,000
> transactions per run.  I varied the number of clients between 10 and
> 100.  It appears from my test JFS is much faster than both ext3 and XFS
> for this workload.  JFS and XFS were made with the mkfs defaults.  ext3
> was made with -T largefile4 and -E stride=32.  The deadline scheduler
> was used for all runs (anticipatory scheduler is much worse).
> 
> Here's the result, in transactions per second.
> 
>               ext3  jfs  xfs
> -----------------------------
>  10 Clients     55   81   68
> 100 Clients     61  100   64
> ----------------------------

If you still have a chance, could you do tests with other journaling
options for ext3 (journal=writeback, journal=data)?  And could you
give figures about performace of other IO elevators?  I mean, you
wrote that anticipatory is much wore -- how much worse? :)  Could
you give numbers for deadline,anticipatory,cfq elevators? :)

And, additionally would it be possible to give numbers for bonnie++
results?  To see how does pgbench to bonnie++ relate?

   Regards,
        Dawid



view thread (11+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <758d5e7f05071401034665841c@mail.gmail.com>
Permalink:  ../758d5e7f05071401034665841c@mail.gmail.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/758d5e7f05071401034665841c@mail.gmail.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: qnex42@gmail.com, jwbaker@acm.org
  Subject: Re: JFS fastest filesystem for PostgreSQL?
  In-Reply-To: <758d5e7f05071401034665841c@mail.gmail.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox