pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Divakar Singh <dpsmails@yahoo.com>
To: jd@commandprompt.com
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Postgres insert performance and storage requirement compared to Oracle
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 11:31:22 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <772167.16310.qm@web65409.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1288030833.8930.30.camel@jd-desktop>
References: <402913.53404.qm@web65405.mail.ac4.yahoo.com>
	<1288030833.8930.30.camel@jd-desktop>


> My questions/scenarios are:
> 
> 1. How does PostgreSQL perform when inserting data into an indexed
> (type: btree) 
> table? Is it true that as you add the indexes on a table, the
> performance 
> deteriorates significantly whereas Oracle does not show that much
> performance 
> decrease. I have tried almost all postgreSQL performance tips
> available. I want 
> to have very good "insert" performance (with indexes), "select"
> performance is 
> not that important at this point of time.

-- Did you test?

Yes. the performance was comparable when using SQL procedure. However, When I 
used libpq, PostgreSQL performed very bad. There was some difference in 
environment also between these 2 tests, but I am assuming libpq vs SQL was the 
real cause. Or it was something else?
 
> 
> 2. What are the average storage requirements of postgres compared to
> Oracle? I 
> inserted upto 1 million records. The storage requirement of postgreSQL
> is almost 
> double than that of Oracle.

 -- What was your table structure?

Some 10-12 columns ( like 2 timestamp, 4 int and 4 varchar), with 5 indexes on 
varchar and int fields including 1 implicit index coz of PK. 



Joshua D. Drake


-- 
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
http://twitter.com/cmdpromptinc | http://identi.ca/commandprompt


      

view thread (53+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <772167.16310.qm@web65409.mail.ac4.yahoo.com>
Permalink:  ../772167.16310.qm@web65409.mail.ac4.yahoo.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/772167.16310.qm@web65409.mail.ac4.yahoo.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: dpsmails@yahoo.com, jd@commandprompt.com
  Subject: Re: Postgres insert performance and storage requirement compared to Oracle
  In-Reply-To: <772167.16310.qm@web65409.mail.ac4.yahoo.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox