From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Cc: Sanyo Moura <sanyo.moura@tatic.net>
Cc: jeff.janes@gmail.com, David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@lists.postgresql.org, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Query with high planning time at version 11.1 compared versions 10.5 and 11.0
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 11:19:24 +0900
Message-ID: <7aa0268e-7fe7-bbda-119d-88a9dcbc189e@lab.ntt.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8db4eca8-6e76-70ff-f934-e0228a1cc298@lab.ntt.co.jp>
References: <20181204215547.7ymtmwaot32slmul@alvherre.pgsql>
<8db4eca8-6e76-70ff-f934-e0228a1cc298@lab.ntt.co.jp>
On 2018/12/06 11:14, Amit Langote wrote:
> I ran the original unmodified query at [1] (the one that produces an empty
> plan due to all children being pruned) against the server built with
> patches I posted on the "speeding up planning with partitions" [2] thread
> and it finished in a jiffy.
Forgot to add the link for [2]: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/21/1778/
Thanks,
Amit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp, alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, pryzby@telsasoft.com, sanyo.moura@tatic.net, david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com, robertmhaas@gmail.com, ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Query with high planning time at version 11.1 compared versions 10.5 and 11.0
In-Reply-To: <7aa0268e-7fe7-bbda-119d-88a9dcbc189e@lab.ntt.co.jp>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox