From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Mark Kirkwood <markir@paradise.net.nz>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] What do the Windows pg hackers out there like for dev
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 11:09:34 -0500
Message-ID: <8128.1139674174@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43ED4488.80207@paradise.net.nz>
References: <7.0.1.0.2.20060210141522.035d4940@earthlink.net>
<43ED4488.80207@paradise.net.nz>
Mark Kirkwood <markir@paradise.net.nz> writes:
> I was doing exactly this about a year ago and used Mingw. The only
> annoyance was that I could compile everything on Linux in about 3
> minutes (P4 2.8Ghz), but had to wait about 60-90 minutes for the same
> thing on Windows 2003 Server! (also a P4 2.8Ghz...). So I used to build
> a 'go for coffee' task into the build and test cycle.
Youch! That seems unbelievably bad, even for Microsloth. Did you ever
identify what was the bottleneck?
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, markir@paradise.net.nz, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] What do the Windows pg hackers out there like for dev
In-Reply-To: <8128.1139674174@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox