pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Pierre C <lists@peufeu.com>
Cc: Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Dave Crooke <dcrooke@gmail.com>
Cc: Paul McGarry <paul@paulmcgarry.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: shared_buffers advice
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:30:32 -0400
Message-ID: <8285.1268749832@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <op.u9nrbeeteorkce@localhost>
References: <a056b1d41003101728h2bfe964cg43bf5ef1aabae14d@mail.gmail.com>
	<ca24673e1003152217q117b0fd3q7d2d75ff20185c8b@mail.gmail.com>
	<4B9F3302.4020900@2ndquadrant.com>
	<op.u9nrbeeteorkce@localhost>

"Pierre C" <lists@peufeu.com> writes:
> Does PG issue checkpoint writes in "sorted" order ?

No.  IIRC, a patch for that was submitted, and rejected because no
significant performance improvement could be demonstrated.  We don't
have enough information about the actual on-disk layout to be very
intelligent about this, so it's better to just issue the writes and
let the OS sort them.

			regards, tom lane



view thread (51+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <8285.1268749832@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../8285.1268749832@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/8285.1268749832@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, lists@peufeu.com, greg@2ndquadrant.com, dcrooke@gmail.com, paul@paulmcgarry.com
  Subject: Re: shared_buffers advice
  In-Reply-To: <8285.1268749832@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox