From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Anton <anton200@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: partitioned table and ORDER BY indexed_field DESC LIMIT 1
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 01:37:29 -0400
Message-ID: <8491.1193463449@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8cac8dd0710262126t147f8974rb58a1e7c615e0725@mail.gmail.com>
References: <46CEB522.9030907@enterprisedb.com>
<C2F454A1.3CA32%llonergan@greenplum.com>
<8cac8dd0710262126t147f8974rb58a1e7c615e0725@mail.gmail.com>
Anton <anton200@gmail.com> writes:
> I want ask about problem with partioned tables (it was discussed some
> time ago, see below). Is it fixed somehow in 8.2.5 ?
No. The patch you mention never was considered at all, since it
consisted of a selective quote from Greenplum source code. It would
not even compile in community Postgres, because it adds calls to half a
dozen Greenplum routines that we've never seen. Not to mention that
the base of the diff is Greenplum proprietary code, so the patch itself
wouldn't even apply successfully.
As to whether it would work if we had the full story ... well, not
having the full story, I don't want to opine.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, anton200@gmail.com
Subject: Re: partitioned table and ORDER BY indexed_field DESC LIMIT 1
In-Reply-To: <8491.1193463449@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox