From: Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>
To: Alex Stapleton <alexs@advfn.com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Partitioning / Clustering
Date: 11 May 2005 16:02:01 -0400
Message-ID: <877ji5r0p2.fsf@stark.xeocode.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CFF798C9-3996-4B99-B3D4-B8B90589E912@advfn.com>
References: <5F94B6EB-3925-4CD3-A67F-4310890B438A@advfn.com>
<1115795780.3830.264.camel@localhost.localdomain>
<CFF798C9-3996-4B99-B3D4-B8B90589E912@advfn.com>
Alex Stapleton <alexs@advfn.com> writes:
> Acceptable Answers to 'So, when/is PG meant to be getting a decent
> partitioning system?':
...
> 3. Your welcome to take a stab at it, I expect the community would
> support your efforts as well.
As long as we're being curt all around, this one's not acceptable on the basis
that it's not grammatical.
--
greg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: gsstark@mit.edu, alexs@advfn.com, simon@2ndquadrant.com
Subject: Re: Partitioning / Clustering
In-Reply-To: <877ji5r0p2.fsf@stark.xeocode.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox