From: Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>
To: Jignesh K. Shah <J.K.Shah@Sun.COM>
Cc: decibel <decibel@decibel.org>
Cc: pgsql-performance\@postgresql.org <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Proposal of tunable fix for scalability of 8.4
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 15:08:12 +0000
Message-ID: <87fxhd33qb.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49BD6840.4000403@sun.com>
References: <C5DEE151.33BA%scott@richrelevance.com>
<49BA53CF.4020702@sun.com>
<49BA742D.3050203@sun.com>
<49BA8CF6.6090604@sun.com>
<49BABBCE.8090501@sun.com>
<D4B5954C-4E01-40B7-BC6E-F98842593889@decibel.org>
<49BD6840.4000403@sun.com>
"Jignesh K. Shah" <J.K.Shah@Sun.COM> writes:
> Generally when there is dead constant.. signs of classic bottleneck ;-) We
> will be fixing one to get to another.. but knocking bottlenecks is the name of
> the game I think
Indeed. I think the bottleneck we're interested in addressing here is why you
say you weren't able to saturate the 64 threads with 64 processes when they're
all RAM-resident.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: stark@enterprisedb.com, J.K.Shah@Sun.COM, decibel@decibel.org
Subject: Re: Proposal of tunable fix for scalability of 8.4
In-Reply-To: <87fxhd33qb.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox