From: Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>
To: Mark Wong <markwkm@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance\@postgresql.org <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Cc: Selena Deckelmann <selenamarie@gmail.com>
Cc: Gabrielle Roth <gorthx@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: dbt-2 tuning results with postgresql-8.3.5
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 01:33:02 +0000
Message-ID: <87hc4yuxbl.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <70c01d1d0812201654i5f55150ep619a6c7ff094470@mail.gmail.com>
References: <70c01d1d0812201654i5f55150ep619a6c7ff094470@mail.gmail.com>
"Mark Wong" <markwkm@gmail.com> writes:
> To recap, dbt2 is a fair-use derivative of the TPC-C benchmark. We
> are using a 1000 warehouse database, which amounts to about 100GB of
> raw text data.
Really? Do you get conforming results with 1,000 warehouses? What's the 95th
percentile response time?
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Ask me about EnterpriseDB's On-Demand Production Tuning
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: stark@enterprisedb.com, markwkm@gmail.com, selenamarie@gmail.com, gorthx@gmail.com
Subject: Re: dbt-2 tuning results with postgresql-8.3.5
In-Reply-To: <87hc4yuxbl.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox