From: Guillaume Cottenceau <gc@mnc.ch>
To: Marti Raudsepp <marti@juffo.org>
Cc: A B <gentosaker@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Running PostgreSQL as fast as possible no matter the consequences
Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 13:06:25 +0100
Message-ID: <87lj58vuta.fsf@meuh.mnc.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimEJbR7zWBLx_HhJ7VkrP=ZK9Uqrs_OEqbqS0nM@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTimcUYuutQeThCaP-077reGYWwdq-ssKwbPne8TO@mail.gmail.com>
<87sjzgxbxe.fsf@meuh.mnc.lan>
<AANLkTimEJbR7zWBLx_HhJ7VkrP=ZK9Uqrs_OEqbqS0nM@mail.gmail.com>
Marti Raudsepp <marti 'at' juffo.org> writes:
> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 13:11, Guillaume Cottenceau <gc@mnc.ch> wrote:
>> Don't use PostgreSQL, just drop your data, you will end up with
>> the same results and be even faster than any use of PostgreSQL.
>> If anyone needs data, then just say you had data corruption, and
>> that since 100% dataloss is accepted, then all's well.
>
> You're not helping. There are legitimate reasons for trading off
> safety for performance.
Cccepting 100% dataloss and datacorruption deserves a little
reasoning, otherwise I'm afraid I'm right in suggesting it makes
little difference to use PG or to drop data altogether.
--
Guillaume Cottenceau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: gc@mnc.ch, marti@juffo.org, gentosaker@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Running PostgreSQL as fast as possible no matter the consequences
In-Reply-To: <87lj58vuta.fsf@meuh.mnc.lan>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox