pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>
To: Dimitri <dimitrik.fr@gmail.com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Performance <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Filesystem Direct I/O and WAL sync option
Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2007 02:13:02 +0100
Message-ID: <87lkdx0y5d.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5482c80a0707030826v38c59870ib90599ba43337e72@mail.gmail.com>
References: <5482c80a0707030754o740c82b6s4598dc668720d014@mail.gmail.com>
	<468A65F5.8020800@enterprisedb.com>
	<5482c80a0707030826v38c59870ib90599ba43337e72@mail.gmail.com>


"Dimitri" <dimitrik.fr@gmail.com> writes:

> Yes, disk drives are also having cache disabled or having cache on
> controllers and battery protected (in case of more  high-level
> storage) - but is it enough to expect data consistency?... (I was
> surprised about checkpoint sync, but does it always calls write()
> anyway? because in this way it should work without fsync)...

Well if everything is mounted in sync mode then I suppose you have the same
guarantee as if fsync were called after every single write. If that's true
then surely that's at least as good. I'm curious how it performs though.

Actually it seems like in that configuration fsync should be basically
zero-cost. In other words, you should be able to leave fsync=on and get the
same performance (whatever that is) and not have to worry about any risks.

-- 
  Gregory Stark
  EnterpriseDB          http://www.enterprisedb.com




view thread (10+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <87lkdx0y5d.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com>
Permalink:  ../87lkdx0y5d.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/87lkdx0y5d.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: stark@enterprisedb.com, dimitrik.fr@gmail.com, heikki@enterprisedb.com
  Subject: Re: Filesystem Direct I/O and WAL sync option
  In-Reply-To: <87lkdx0y5d.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox