From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
Cc: Peter Koczan <pjkoczan@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: sequence query performance issues
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 10:16:19 -0400
Message-ID: <886.1190988979@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46FCB5F3.4080600@archonet.com>
References: <4544e0330709271504g364fd042u161966fa448934f6@mail.gmail.com>
<46FCB5F3.4080600@archonet.com>
Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com> writes:
> Hmm - why is it doing that?
I'm betting that the OP's people.uid column is not an integer. Existing
PG releases can't use hashed subplans for cross-data-type comparisons
(8.3 will be a bit smarter).
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, dev@archonet.com, pjkoczan@gmail.com
Subject: Re: sequence query performance issues
In-Reply-To: <886.1190988979@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox