From: Laurent Laborde <kerdezixe@gmail.com>
To: Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Scott Carey <scott@richrelevance.com>
Cc: Craig James <craig_james@emolecules.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: limiting performance impact of wal archiving.
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:21:25 +0100
Message-ID: <8a1bfe660911120621x261a19c7r972ddb4a97080ca9@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AFBAF87.7060405@2ndquadrant.com>
References: <C720ED0E.167A3%scott@richrelevance.com>
<4AFBAF87.7060405@2ndquadrant.com>
Hi !
Here is my plan :
- rebuilding a spare with ext3, raid10, without lvm
- switch the slony master to this new node.
We'll see ...
Thx for all the info !!!
--
Ker2x
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: kerdezixe@gmail.com, greg@2ndquadrant.com, scott@richrelevance.com, craig_james@emolecules.com
Subject: Re: limiting performance impact of wal archiving.
In-Reply-To: <8a1bfe660911120621x261a19c7r972ddb4a97080ca9@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox