From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Sabin Coanda <sabin.coanda@deuromedia.ro>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: transaction ID wrap limit
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 10:51:01 -0500
Message-ID: <9113.1166457061@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <em5mse$e51$1@news.hub.org>
References: <em5mse$e51$1@news.hub.org>
"Sabin Coanda" <sabin.coanda@deuromedia.ro> writes:
> A vacuum full command logs the message:
> ... LOG: transaction ID wrap limit is 1073822617, limited by database "A"
> Sometimes ago, the vacuum full logged:
> ... LOG: transaction ID wrap limit is 2147484148, limited by database "A"
> What causes that difference of the limit ?
The limit is *supposed* to advance. The fact that it jumped this much
in one step suggests you're not vacuuming often enough :-(
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, sabin.coanda@deuromedia.ro
Subject: Re: transaction ID wrap limit
In-Reply-To: <9113.1166457061@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox