From: Artis Caune <artis.caune@gmail.com>
To: Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: UFS 2: soft updates vs. gjournal (AKA: Choosing a filesystem 2.)
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 13:52:44 +0300
Message-ID: <9e20d71e0809240352q3c7f1478qfa2a78aac95eb6f@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48DA13EF.3060103@shopzeus.com>
References: <48DA13EF.3060103@shopzeus.com>
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com> wrote:
> Here is my opinion: I suspect that gjournal would be much slower than
> soft updates. Also gjournal is relatively new code, not very well
> tested.
In some cases it's much faster than SU, in other a bit slower. :)
gjournal is quiet "old" code, it's already more than two years around,
and very stable. Haven't seen any gjournal related crash.
--
regards,
Artis Caune
<----. CCNA
<----|====================
<----' didii FreeBSD
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: artis.caune@gmail.com, gandalf@shopzeus.com
Subject: Re: UFS 2: soft updates vs. gjournal (AKA: Choosing a filesystem 2.)
In-Reply-To: <9e20d71e0809240352q3c7f1478qfa2a78aac95eb6f@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox