From: hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz@gmail.com>
To: femski <hypertree@yahoo.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Postgres batch write very slow - what to do
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 05:52:39 +0100
Message-ID: <9e4684ce0703162152u4abe97fcg64d0804f57ce95b1@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9452092.post@talk.nabble.com>
References: <9452092.post@talk.nabble.com>
On 3/13/07, femski <hypertree@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I have a batch application that writes approx. 4 million rows into a narrow
> table. I am using JDBC addBatch/ExecuteBatch with auto commit turned off.
> Batch size is 100. So far I am seeing Postgres take roughly five times the
> time it takes to do this in the Oracle.
you can try to use pg_bulkload.
since it is called as standard function you shouldn't have problems
with jdbc. and it's apparently fast.
depesz
http://pgfoundry.org/projects/pgbulkload/
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: depesz@gmail.com, hypertree@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: Postgres batch write very slow - what to do
In-Reply-To: <9e4684ce0703162152u4abe97fcg64d0804f57ce95b1@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox