pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
Another index related question....
  2008-08-07 14:30 UTC  ries van Twisk <pg@rvt.dds.nl>

pg_dump error - out of memory, Failed on request of size 536870912
  2008-08-06 09:48 UTC  Marcin Citowicki <marcin.citowicki@m4n.nl>
` Re: pg_dump error - out of memory, Failed on request of size 536870912
  2008-08-06 10:26 UTC  Marcin Citowicki <marcin.citowicki@m4n.nl>
` Re: pg_dump error - out of memory, Failed on request of size 536870912
  2008-08-06 12:21 UTC  Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
` Re: pg_dump error - out of memory, Failed on request of size 536870912
  2008-08-06 12:33 UTC  Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>
  [4+ messages in thread]

Posible planner improvement?
  2008-05-21 10:28 UTC  Albert Cervera Areny <albert@sedifa.com>
` Re: Posible planner improvement?
  2008-05-21 10:48 UTC  Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
` Re: Posible planner improvement?
  2008-05-21 11:11 UTC  Albert Cervera Areny <albert@sedifa.com>
` Re: Posible planner improvement?
  2008-05-21 11:24 UTC  Mark Mielke <mark@mark.mielke.cc>
` Re: Posible planner improvement?
  2008-05-21 11:30 UTC  Albert Cervera Areny <albert@sedifa.com>
` Re: Posible planner improvement?
  2008-05-21 11:37 UTC  Albert Cervera Areny <albert@sedifa.com>
` Re: Posible planner improvement?
  2008-05-21 11:52 UTC  Luke Lonergan <LLonergan@greenplum.com>
` Re: Posible planner improvement?
  2008-05-21 13:09 UTC  Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
` Re: Posible planner improvement?
  2008-05-21 16:18 UTC  PFC <lists@peufeu.com>
` Re: Posible planner improvement?
  2008-05-21 16:22 UTC  Albert Cervera Areny <albert@sedifa.com>
` Re: Posible planner improvement?
  2008-05-24 18:49 UTC  Decibel! <decibel@decibel.org>
` Re: [PERFORM] Posible planner improvement?
  2008-05-25 08:21 UTC  Stephen R. van den Berg <srb@cuci.nl>
` Re: Posible planner improvement?
  2008-05-26 11:30 UTC  ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>
` Re: Posible planner improvement?
  2008-08-04 18:16 UTC  Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
  [14+ messages in thread]

SSD Performance Article
  2008-07-31 17:45 UTC  Matthew T. O'Connor <matthew@zeut.net>
` Re: SSD Performance Article
  2008-08-01 01:27 UTC  Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
` Re: SSD Performance Article
  2008-08-04 11:20 UTC  H. Hall <hhall1001@reedyriver.com>
  [3+ messages in thread]

Database size Vs performance degradation
  2008-07-30 12:09 UTC  Dave North <DNorth@signiant.com>
` Re: Database size Vs performance degradation
  2008-07-30 12:28 UTC  Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
` Re: Database size Vs performance degradation
  2008-07-30 12:36 UTC  Matthew Wakeling <matthew@flymine.org>
` Re: Database size Vs performance degradation
  2008-07-30 12:41 UTC  Dave North <DNorth@signiant.com>
` Re: Database size Vs performance degradation
  2008-07-30 12:43 UTC  Dave North <DNorth@signiant.com>
` Re: Database size Vs performance degradation
  2008-07-30 14:57 UTC  Valentin Bogdanov <valiouk@yahoo.co.uk>
` Re: Database size Vs performance degradation
  2008-07-30 15:02 UTC  Dave North <DNorth@signiant.com>
` Re: Database size Vs performance degradation
  2008-07-30 15:05 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: Database size Vs performance degradation
  2008-07-30 15:32 UTC  Craig James <craig_james@emolecules.com>
` Re: Database size Vs performance degradation
  2008-07-30 15:46 UTC  Mark Roberts <mailing_lists@pandapocket.com>
` Re: Database size Vs performance degradation
  2008-07-30 16:16 UTC  Matthew Wakeling <matthew@flymine.org>
` Re: Database size Vs performance degradation
  2008-07-30 16:48 UTC  Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>
` Re: Database size Vs performance degradation
  2008-07-30 16:49 UTC  Mark Roberts <mailing_lists@pandapocket.com>
` Re: Database size Vs performance degradation
  2008-07-30 17:18 UTC  Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
` Re: Database size Vs performance degradation
  2008-07-30 17:39 UTC  Dave North <DNorth@signiant.com>
` Re: Database size Vs performance degradation
  2008-07-30 17:51 UTC  Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>
` Re: Database size Vs performance degradation
  2008-07-30 17:51 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: Database size Vs performance degradation
  2008-07-30 18:04 UTC  Mark Roberts <mailing_lists@pandapocket.com>
` Re: Database size Vs performance degradation
  2008-07-30 21:58 UTC  Miernik <public@public.miernik.name>
` Re: Database size Vs performance degradation
  2008-07-30 22:14 UTC  Mark Roberts <mailing_lists@pandapocket.com>
` Re: Database size Vs performance degradation
  2008-07-31 17:49 UTC  Andrzej Zawadzki <zawadaa@wp.pl>
` Re: Database size Vs performance degradation
  2008-08-01 11:03 UTC  Matthew Wakeling <matthew@flymine.org>
` Re: Database size Vs performance degradation
  2008-08-03 23:51 UTC  Fernando Ike <fike@midstorm.org>
  [23+ messages in thread]

Nls sorting in Postgresql-8.3.3
  2008-08-01 08:35 UTC  Praveen <praveen.k@renaissance-it.com>
` Re: [PERFORM] Nls sorting in Postgresql-8.3.3
  2008-08-01 08:43 UTC  Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
` Re: Nls sorting in Postgresql-8.3.3
  2008-08-02 10:39 UTC  Mathias Stjernström <mathias@globalinn.com>
  [3+ messages in thread]

how to fix problem then when two queries run at the same time, it takes longer to complete then if run in sequence
  2008-07-23 15:21 UTC  Miernik <public@public.miernik.name>
` Re: how to fix problem then when two queries run at the same time, it takes longer to complete then if run in sequence
  2008-07-23 17:25 UTC  Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
` Re: how to fix problem then when two queries run at the same time, it takes longer to complete then if run in sequence
  2008-07-23 19:30 UTC  Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
` Re: how to fix problem then when two queries run at the same time, it takes longer to complete then if run in sequence
  2008-07-23 20:32 UTC  Miernik <public@public.miernik.name>
` Re: how to fix problem then when two queries run at the same time, it takes longer to complete then if run in sequence
  2008-07-23 20:43 UTC  Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
` Re: how to fix problem then when two queries run at the same time, it takes longer to complete then if run in sequence
  2008-07-23 23:04 UTC  Miernik <public@public.miernik.name>
` Re: how to fix problem then when two queries run at the same time, it takes longer to complete then if run in sequence
  2008-07-24 07:38 UTC  Albert Cervera Areny <albert@sedifa.com>
` Re: how to fix problem then when two queries run at the same time, it takes longer to complete then if run in sequence
  2008-07-24 08:44 UTC  Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
` Re: how to fix problem then when two queries run at the   same time, it takes longer to complete then if run in sequence
  2008-07-31 06:15 UTC  Miernik <public@public.miernik.name>
` Re: how to fix problem then when two queries run at the same time, it takes longer to complete then if run in sequence
  2008-07-31 07:36 UTC  Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
` Re: how to fix problem then when two queries run at the same time, it takes longer to complete then if run in sequence
  2008-07-31 08:29 UTC  Miernik <public@public.miernik.name>
` Re: how to fix problem then when two queries run at the same time, it takes longer to complete then if run in sequence
  2008-07-31 08:46 UTC  Theo Kramer <theo@flame.co.za>
` Re: how to fix problem then when two queries run at the same time, it takes longer to complete then if run in sequence
  2008-07-31 09:17 UTC  Miernik <public@public.miernik.name>
` Re: how to fix problem then when two queries run at the same time, it takes longer to complete then if run in sequence
  2008-07-31 09:24 UTC  Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
` Re: how to fix problem then when two queries run at the same time, it takes longer to complete then if run in sequence
  2008-07-31 09:45 UTC  Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
` Re: how to fix problem then when two queries run at the same time, it takes longer to complete then if run in sequence
  2008-07-31 09:52 UTC  Theo Kramer <theo@flame.co.za>
` Re: how to fix problem then when two queries run at the same time, it takes longer to complete then if run in sequence
  2008-07-31 10:24 UTC  Craig Ringer <craig@postnewspapers.com.au>
` Re: how to fix problem then when two queries run at the same time, it takes longer to complete then if run in sequence
  2008-07-31 15:30 UTC  Steve Crawford <scrawford@pinpointresearch.com>
  [18+ messages in thread]

what is less resource-intensive, WHERE id IN or INNER JOIN?
  2008-07-30 22:11 UTC  Miernik <public@public.miernik.name>
` Re: what is less resource-intensive, WHERE id IN or INNER JOIN?
  2008-07-31 06:47 UTC  Scott Carey <scott@richrelevance.com>
  [2+ messages in thread]

why "WHERE uid NOT IN" is so slow, and EXCEPT in the same situtation is fast?
  2008-07-31 02:45 UTC  Miernik <public@public.miernik.name>
` Re: why "WHERE uid NOT IN" is so slow, and EXCEPT in the same situtation is fast?
  2008-07-31 03:08 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: why "WHERE uid NOT IN" is so slow, and EXCEPT in the same situtation is fast?
  2008-07-31 03:18 UTC  Miernik <public@public.miernik.name>
` Re: why "WHERE uid NOT IN" is so slow, and EXCEPT in the same situtation is fast?
  2008-07-31 03:55 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
  [4+ messages in thread]

Difference between "Explain analyze" and "\timing"
  2008-07-31 00:19 UTC  tarcizioab@c3sl.ufpr.br
` Re: Difference between "Explain analyze" and "\timing"
  2008-07-31 00:59 UTC  Bill Moran <wmoran@collaborativefusion.com>
` Re: Difference between "Explain analyze" and "\timing"
  2008-07-31 01:06 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
  [3+ messages in thread]

how does pg handle concurrent queries and same queries
  2008-07-28 06:43 UTC  Faludi Gábor <gfaludi@fits.hu>
` Re: how does pg handle concurrent queries and same queries
  2008-07-28 06:55 UTC  Claus Guttesen <kometen@gmail.com>
` Re: how does pg handle concurrent queries and same queries
  2008-07-28 07:53 UTC  Faludi Gábor <gfaludi@fits.hu>
` Re: how does pg handle concurrent queries and same queries
  2008-07-28 08:46 UTC  Craig Ringer <craig@postnewspapers.com.au>
` Re: how does pg handle concurrent queries and same queries
  2008-07-28 11:27 UTC  Matthew Wakeling <matthew@flymine.org>
` Re: how does pg handle concurrent queries and same queries
  2008-07-28 13:47 UTC  Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
` Re: how does pg handle concurrent queries and same queries
  2008-07-30 18:34 UTC  Dennis Brakhane <brakhane@googlemail.com>
  [7+ messages in thread]

A guide/tutorial to performance monitoring and tuning
  2008-06-27 14:23 UTC  Nikhil G. Daddikar <ngd@celoxis.com>
` Re: A guide/tutorial to performance monitoring and tuning
  2008-06-27 15:37 UTC  Andreas Kretschmer <akretschmer@spamfence.net>
` Re: A guide/tutorial to performance monitoring and tuning
  2008-06-27 17:21 UTC  Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
` Re: A guide/tutorial to performance monitoring and tuning
  2008-06-29 18:59 UTC  Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>
` Re: A guide/tutorial to performance monitoring and tuning
  2008-06-30 13:54 UTC  Cédric Villemain <cedric.villemain@dalibo.com>
` Re: A guide/tutorial to performance monitoring and tuning
  2008-07-21 21:27 UTC  Francisco Reyes <lists@stringsutils.com>
` Re: A guide/tutorial to performance monitoring and tuning
  2008-07-22 05:24 UTC  Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>
` Re: A guide/tutorial to performance monitoring and tuning
  2008-07-28 20:17 UTC  Mark Wong <markwkm@gmail.com>
  [8+ messages in thread]

Using ENUM with huge NAMEDATALEN
  2008-07-26 21:22 UTC  David Andersen <david@andersen.gs>
` Re: Using ENUM with huge NAMEDATALEN
  2008-07-26 21:44 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: Using ENUM with huge NAMEDATALEN
  2008-07-26 21:48 UTC  David Andersen <david@andersen.gs>
` Re: Using ENUM with huge NAMEDATALEN
  2008-07-27 00:13 UTC  David Andersen <david@andersen.gs>
` Re: Using ENUM with huge NAMEDATALEN
  2008-07-27 00:36 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
  [5+ messages in thread]

Partitioned Tables Foreign Key Constraints Problem
  2008-07-24 10:15 UTC  Gauri Kanekar <meetgaurikanekar@gmail.com>
` Re: Partitioned Tables Foreign Key Constraints Problem
  2008-07-25 22:31 UTC  Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
  [2+ messages in thread]

Perl/DBI vs Native
  2008-07-21 11:19 UTC  Valentin Bogdanov <valiouk@yahoo.co.uk>
` Re: Perl/DBI vs Native
  2008-07-21 13:49 UTC  Craig Ringer <craig@postnewspapers.com.au>
` Re: Perl/DBI vs Native
  2008-07-21 13:57 UTC  Rusty Conover <rconover@infogears.com>
` Re: Perl/DBI vs Native
  2008-07-21 17:24 UTC  Craig James <craig_james@emolecules.com>
` Re: Perl/DBI vs Native
  2008-07-21 18:44 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: Perl/DBI vs Native
  2008-07-21 20:37 UTC  Greg Sabino Mullane <greg@turnstep.com>
` Re: Perl/DBI vs Native
  2008-07-22 11:32 UTC  Valentin Bogdanov <valiouk@yahoo.co.uk>
` Re: Perl/DBI vs Native
  2008-07-22 16:48 UTC  Greg Sabino Mullane <greg@turnstep.com>
` Re: Perl/DBI vs Native
  2008-07-22 20:35 UTC  Jeffrey Baker <jwbaker@gmail.com>
` Re: Perl/DBI vs Native
  2008-07-23 10:46 UTC  Valentin Bogdanov <valiouk@yahoo.co.uk>
  [10+ messages in thread]

Performance of jobs
  2008-07-22 15:44 UTC  samantha mahindrakar <sam.mahindrakar@gmail.com>
` Re: Performance of jobs
  2008-07-22 16:13 UTC  Craig Ringer <craig@postnewspapers.com.au>
` Re: Performance of jobs
  2008-07-22 18:59 UTC  samantha mahindrakar <sam.mahindrakar@gmail.com>
` Re: Performance of jobs
  2008-07-23 01:15 UTC  Craig Ringer <craig@postnewspapers.com.au>
  [4+ messages in thread]

Performance on Sun Fire X4150 x64 (dd, bonnie++, pgbench)
  2008-07-19 13:19 UTC  Stephane Bailliez <sbailliez@gmail.com>
` Re: Performance on Sun Fire X4150 x64 (dd, bonnie++, pgbench)
  2008-07-19 13:59 UTC  Luke Lonergan <LLonergan@greenplum.com>
` Re: Performance on Sun Fire X4150 x64 (dd, bonnie++, pgbench)
  2008-07-20 23:12 UTC  Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>
` Re: Performance on Sun Fire X4150 x64 (dd, bonnie++, pgbench)
  2008-07-21 08:53 UTC  Stephane Bailliez <sbailliez@gmail.com>
` Re: Performance on Sun Fire X4150 x64 (dd, bonnie++, pgbench)
  2008-07-21 08:57 UTC  Luke Lonergan <llonergan@greenplum.com>
` Re: Performance on Sun Fire X4150 x64 (dd, bonnie++, pgbench)
  2008-07-21 10:11 UTC  Stephane Bailliez <sbailliez@gmail.com>
` Re: Performance on Sun Fire X4150 x64 (dd, bonnie++, pgbench)
  2008-07-21 18:43 UTC  Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>
` Re: Performance on Sun Fire X4150 x64 (dd, bonnie++,	pgbench)
  2008-07-21 23:20 UTC  Emil Pedersen <emil.pedersen@its.uu.se>
` Re: Performance on Sun Fire X4150 x64 (dd,	bonnie++,	pgbench)
  2008-07-21 23:34 UTC  Emil Pedersen <emil.pedersen@its.uu.se>
` Re: Performance on Sun Fire X4150 x64 (dd, bonnie++, pgbench)
  2008-07-22 00:06 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: Performance on Sun Fire X4150 x64 (dd, bonnie++, pgbench)
  2008-07-22 06:46 UTC  Stephane Bailliez <sbailliez@gmail.com>
` Re: Performance on Sun Fire X4150 x64 (dd, bonnie++, pgbench)
  2008-07-22 17:21 UTC  Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>
  [12+ messages in thread]

Difference between 8.1 & 8.3
  2008-07-16 21:37 UTC  Patrick Vachon <pvachon.videotron@videotron.ca>
` Re: Difference between 8.1 & 8.3
  2008-07-16 21:59 UTC  Gregory Williamson <Gregory.Williamson@digitalglobe.com>
` Re: Difference between 8.1 & 8.3
  2008-07-22 15:15 UTC  Patrick Vachon <pvachon.videotron@videotron.ca>
  [3+ messages in thread]

Less rows -> better performance?
  2008-07-21 10:50 UTC  Andreas Hartmann <andreas@apache.org>
` Re: Less rows -> better performance?
  2008-07-21 11:06 UTC  Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
` Re: Less rows -> better performance?
  2008-07-21 11:25 UTC  Andreas Hartmann <andreas@apache.org>
` Re: Less rows -> better performance?
  2008-07-21 11:32 UTC  Guillaume Smet <guillaume.smet@gmail.com>
` Re: Less rows -> better performance?
  2008-07-21 12:11 UTC  Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
` Re: Less rows -> better performance?
  2008-07-21 13:53 UTC  Craig Ringer <craig@postnewspapers.com.au>
` Re: Less rows -> better performance?
  2008-07-21 14:00 UTC  Christian GRANDIN <christian.grandin@gmail.com>
` Re: Less rows -> better performance?
  2008-07-21 14:45 UTC  Andreas Hartmann <andreas@apache.org>
` Re: Less rows -> better performance?
  2008-07-21 14:56 UTC  Harald Armin Massa <haraldarminmassa@gmail.com>
` Re: Less rows -> better performance?
  2008-07-21 15:14 UTC  Andreas Hartmann <andreas@apache.org>
` Re: Less rows -> better performance?
  2008-07-21 15:29 UTC  Mario Weilguni <mweilguni@sime.com>
` Re: Less rows -> better performance?
  2008-07-22 07:48 UTC  Łukasz Filut <l.filut@wsb.pl>
  [12+ messages in thread]

[BACKUPS]Little backups
  2008-07-21 18:20 UTC  Leví Teodoro da Silva <tlevisilva@gmail.com>
` Re: [BACKUPS]Little backups
  2008-07-21 18:28 UTC  Berge Schwebs Bjørlo <berge@trivini.no>
` Re: [BACKUPS]Little backups
  2008-07-21 18:30 UTC  Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
` Re: [BACKUPS]Little backups
  2008-07-21 18:30 UTC  Albert Cervera Areny <albert@sedifa.com>
` Re: [BACKUPS]Little backups
  2008-07-21 18:38 UTC  A. Kretschmer <andreas.kretschmer@schollglas.com>
` Re: [BACKUPS]Little backups
  2008-07-21 19:01 UTC  Levi <tlevisilva@gmail.com>
  [6+ messages in thread]

log_statement at postgres.conf
  2008-07-17 08:43 UTC  System/IJS - Joko <system@ijs.co.id>
` Re: log_statement at postgres.conf
  2008-07-17 09:29 UTC  Claus Guttesen <kometen@gmail.com>
` Re: log_statement at postgres.conf
  2008-07-17 09:40 UTC  Pomarede Nicolas <npomarede@corp.free.fr>
` Re: log_statement at postgres.conf
  2008-07-18 05:48 UTC  System/IJS - Joko <system@ijs.co.id>
` Re: log_statement at postgres.conf
  2008-07-18 08:16 UTC  Pomarede Nicolas <npomarede@corp.free.fr>
` Re: log_statement at postgres.conf
  2008-07-21 06:35 UTC  System/IJS - Joko <system@ijs.co.id>
` Re: log_statement at postgres.conf
  2008-07-21 08:27 UTC  Pomarede Nicolas <npomarede@corp.free.fr>
  [7+ messages in thread]

3ware vs Areca
  2008-07-11 13:26 UTC  Jeff <threshar@torgo.978.org>
` Re: 3ware vs Areca
  2008-07-11 14:19 UTC  Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
` Re: 3ware vs Areca
  2008-07-11 14:59 UTC  Luke Lonergan <llonergan@greenplum.com>
` Re: 3ware vs Areca
  2008-07-11 17:46 UTC  Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
` Re: 3ware vs Areca
  2008-07-11 19:21 UTC  Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>
` Re: 3ware vs Areca
  2008-07-11 19:39 UTC  Jeffrey Baker <jwbaker@gmail.com>
` Re: 3ware vs Areca
  2008-07-11 19:52 UTC  Jeff <threshar@torgo.978.org>
` Re: 3ware vs Areca
  2008-07-11 19:58 UTC  Jeff <threshar@torgo.978.org>
` Re: 3ware vs Areca
  2008-07-12 00:39 UTC  Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>
` Re: 3ware vs Areca
  2008-07-15 04:13 UTC  Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>
` Re: 3ware vs Areca
  2008-07-15 14:46 UTC  Jeffrey Baker <jwbaker@gmail.com>
` Re: 3ware vs Areca
  2008-07-15 15:17 UTC  Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>
` Re: 3ware vs Areca
  2008-07-15 15:54 UTC  Jeffrey Baker <jwbaker@gmail.com>
` Re: 3ware vs Areca
  2008-07-19 01:39 UTC  Francisco Reyes <lists@stringsutils.com>
` Re: 3ware vs Areca
  2008-07-20 23:10 UTC  Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>
  [15+ messages in thread]

An "obvious" index not being used
  2008-06-19 01:07 UTC  Daniele Varrazzo <piro@develer.com>
` Re: An "obvious" index not being used
  2008-06-19 01:43 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: An "obvious" index not being used
  2008-06-19 02:19 UTC  Daniele Varrazzo <piro@develer.com>
` Re: An "obvious" index not being used
  2008-06-19 13:46 UTC  Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
` Re: An "obvious" index not being used
  2008-06-19 14:03 UTC  Daniele Varrazzo <piro@develer.com>
` Re: An "obvious" index not being used
  2008-07-19 01:45 UTC  Francisco Reyes <lists@stringsutils.com>
` Re: An "obvious" index not being used
  2008-07-19 17:21 UTC  Daniele Varrazzo <piro@develer.com>
` Re: An "obvious" index not being used
  2008-07-20 04:44 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: An "obvious" index not being used
  2008-07-20 23:07 UTC  Daniele Varrazzo <piro@develer.com>
  [9+ messages in thread]

Backup/Restore of single table in multi TB database
  2008-05-07 20:02 UTC  John Smith <sodgodofall@gmail.com>
` Re: Backup/Restore of single table in multi TB database
  2008-05-07 20:09 UTC  David Wilson <david.t.wilson@gmail.com>
` Re: Backup/Restore of single table in multi TB database
  2008-05-07 20:11 UTC  Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
` Re: Backup/Restore of single table in multi TB database
  2008-05-07 20:16 UTC  Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
` Re: Backup/Restore of single table in multi TB database
  2008-05-07 21:28 UTC  Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
` Re: Backup/Restore of single table in multi TB database
  2008-05-07 21:41 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: Backup/Restore of single table in multi TB database
  2008-05-07 22:24 UTC  John Smith <sodgodofall@gmail.com>
` Re: Backup/Restore of single table in multi TB database
  2008-05-08 06:25 UTC  Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
` Re: Backup/Restore of single table in multi TB database
  2008-07-19 00:25 UTC  Francisco Reyes <lists@stringsutils.com>
` Re: Backup/Restore of single table in multi TB database
  2008-07-19 09:02 UTC  Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
  [10+ messages in thread]

Mailing list hacked by spammer?
  2008-07-18 15:02 UTC  Craig James <craig_james@emolecules.com>
` Re: Mailing list hacked by spammer?
  2008-07-18 15:41 UTC  Steve Atkins <steve@blighty.com>
` Re: Mailing list hacked by spammer?
  2008-07-18 16:21 UTC  Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
` Re: Mailing list hacked by spammer?
  2008-07-18 16:37 UTC  Glyn Astill <glynastill@yahoo.co.uk>
` Re: Mailing list hacked by spammer?
  2008-07-18 17:40 UTC  Craig James <craig_james@emolecules.com>
` Re: Mailing list hacked by spammer?
  2008-07-18 18:07 UTC  Andrew Sullivan <ajs@commandprompt.com>
` Re: Mailing list hacked by spammer?
  2008-07-18 18:41 UTC  Glyn Astill <glynastill@yahoo.co.uk>
  [7+ messages in thread]


[next (older)]

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox