pg.ddx.io pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive
help / color / mirror / Atom feedbig distinct clause vs. group by
2011-03-16 08:45 UTC Uwe Bartels <uwe.bartels@gmail.com>
` Re: big distinct clause vs. group by
2011-04-18 16:19 UTC Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
` Re: big distinct clause vs. group by
2011-04-18 17:13 UTC Uwe Bartels <uwe.bartels@gmail.com>
` Re: big distinct clause vs. group by
2011-04-19 08:24 UTC Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com>
` Re: big distinct clause vs. group by
2011-04-19 08:47 UTC Uwe Bartels <uwe.bartels@gmail.com>
` Re: big distinct clause vs. group by
2011-04-19 09:07 UTC Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com>
` Re: big distinct clause vs. group by
2011-04-19 09:22 UTC Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
` Re: big distinct clause vs. group by
2011-04-23 19:34 UTC Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
` Re: big distinct clause vs. group by
2011-04-24 19:01 UTC Uwe Bartels <uwe.bartels@gmail.com>
` Re: big distinct clause vs. group by
2011-04-25 14:22 UTC Віталій Тимчишин <tivv00@gmail.com>
` Re: big distinct clause vs. group by
2011-04-25 19:01 UTC Uwe Bartels <uwe.bartels@gmail.com>
[11+ messages in thread]
Issue with partition elimination
2011-04-22 01:26 UTC Paul Pierce <paulpierce70@yahoo.com>
` Re: Issue with partition elimination
2011-04-25 18:06 UTC Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
[2+ messages in thread]
How to configure a read-only database server?
2011-04-18 22:08 UTC Stefan Keller <sfkeller@gmail.com>
` Re: How to configure a read-only database server?
2011-04-19 07:45 UTC philippe <pg@rimbault.org>
` Re: How to configure a read-only database server?
2011-04-19 08:57 UTC Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com>
` Re: How to configure a read-only database server?
2011-04-19 14:30 UTC Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com>
` Re: How to configure a read-only database server?
2011-04-23 16:10 UTC Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
` Re: How to configure a read-only database server?
2011-04-24 09:38 UTC Stefan Keller <sfkeller@gmail.com>
` Re: How to configure a read-only database server?
2011-04-24 12:37 UTC Tomas Vondra <tv@fuzzy.cz>
[7+ messages in thread]
oom_killer
2011-04-21 08:28 UTC Tory M Blue <tmblue@gmail.com>
` Re: oom_killer
2011-04-21 12:37 UTC yoshi watanabe <yoshi314@gmail.com>
` Re: oom_killer
2011-04-21 12:48 UTC Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
` Re: oom_killer
2011-04-21 12:53 UTC Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
` Re: oom_killer
2011-04-21 13:02 UTC Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
` Re: oom_killer
2011-04-21 14:27 UTC Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
` Re: oom_killer
2011-04-21 15:50 UTC Tory M Blue <tmblue@gmail.com>
` Re: oom_killer
2011-04-21 15:54 UTC Tory M Blue <tmblue@gmail.com>
` Re: oom_killer
2011-04-21 15:57 UTC Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
` Re: oom_killer
2011-04-21 16:15 UTC Tory M Blue <tmblue@gmail.com>
` Re: oom_killer
2011-04-21 16:37 UTC Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
` Re: oom_killer
2011-04-21 20:04 UTC Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
` Re: oom_killer
2011-04-21 20:08 UTC Tory M Blue <tmblue@gmail.com>
` Re: oom_killer
2011-04-21 20:08 UTC J Sisson <sisson.j@gmail.com>
` Re: oom_killer
2011-04-21 20:11 UTC Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
` Re: oom_killer
2011-04-21 20:12 UTC Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
` Re: oom_killer
2011-04-22 11:03 UTC Cédric Villemain <cedric.villemain.debian@gmail.com>
` Re: oom_killer
2011-04-22 16:27 UTC Tory M Blue <tmblue@gmail.com>
` Re: oom_killer
2011-04-22 16:34 UTC Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
` Re: oom_killer
2011-04-22 16:37 UTC Tory M Blue <tmblue@gmail.com>
` Re: oom_killer
2011-04-22 16:45 UTC Cédric Villemain <cedric.villemain.debian@gmail.com>
` Re: oom_killer
2011-04-22 16:46 UTC Cédric Villemain <cedric.villemain.debian@gmail.com>
` Re: oom_killer
2011-04-22 17:18 UTC Tory M Blue <tmblue@gmail.com>
` Re: oom_killer
2011-04-22 18:15 UTC David Rees <drees76@gmail.com>
` Re: oom_killer
2011-04-22 18:22 UTC Tory M Blue <tmblue@gmail.com>
` Re: oom_killer
2011-04-22 19:02 UTC Tory M Blue <tmblue@gmail.com>
` Re: oom_killer
2011-04-22 19:18 UTC Cédric Villemain <cedric.villemain.debian@gmail.com>
` Re: oom_killer
2011-04-22 23:19 UTC Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
` Re: oom_killer
2011-04-23 19:24 UTC Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
` Re: oom_killer
2011-04-24 04:22 UTC Tory M Blue <tmblue@gmail.com>
[30+ messages in thread]
not using partial index
2011-04-20 08:46 UTC Willy-Bas Loos <willybas@gmail.com>
` Re: not using partial index
2011-04-20 13:25 UTC Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: not using partial index
2011-04-23 15:48 UTC Henry <henry.valdivia1@gmail.com>
[3+ messages in thread]
OT (slightly) testing for data loss on an SSD drive due to power failure
2011-04-22 14:04 UTC John Rouillard <rouilj@renesys.com>
` Re: OT (slightly) testing for data loss on an SSD drive due to power failure
2011-04-23 02:48 UTC Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com>
[2+ messages in thread]
postgresql random io test with 2 SSD Kingston V+100 500GB in (software) Raid1
2011-04-19 09:15 UTC Laurent Laborde <kerdezixe@gmail.com>
` Re: postgresql random io test with 2 SSD Kingston V+100 500GB in (software) Raid1
2011-04-19 09:28 UTC Laurent Laborde <kerdezixe@gmail.com>
` Re: postgresql random io test with 2 SSD Kingston V+100 500GB in (software) Raid1
2011-04-19 12:07 UTC Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com>
` Re: postgresql random io test with 2 SSD Kingston V+100 500GB in (software) Raid1
2011-04-19 12:36 UTC Laurent Laborde <kerdezixe@gmail.com>
` Re: postgresql random io test with 2 SSD Kingston V+100 500GB in (software) Raid1
2011-04-19 12:49 UTC Laurent Laborde <kerdezixe@gmail.com>
` Re: postgresql random io test with 2 SSD Kingston V+100 500GB in (software) Raid1
2011-04-19 13:21 UTC Nicholson, Brad (Toronto, ON, CA) <bnicholson@hp.com>
` Re: postgresql random io test with 2 SSD Kingston V+100 500GB in (software) Raid1
2011-04-19 13:44 UTC Laurent Laborde <kerdezixe@gmail.com>
` Re: postgresql random io test with 2 SSD Kingston V+100 500GB in (software) Raid1
2011-04-20 12:39 UTC Jeff <threshar@torgo.978.org>
` Re: postgresql random io test with 2 SSD Kingston V+100 500GB in (software) Raid1
2011-04-20 14:01 UTC Laurent Laborde <kerdezixe@gmail.com>
` Re: postgresql random io test with 2 SSD Kingston V+100 500GB in (software) Raid1
2011-04-20 15:40 UTC Shaun Thomas <sthomas@peak6.com>
` Re: postgresql random io test with 2 SSD Kingston V+100 500GB in (software) Raid1
2011-04-21 08:02 UTC Laurent Laborde <kerdezixe@gmail.com>
` Re: postgresql random io test with 2 SSD Kingston V+100 500GB in (software) Raid1
2011-04-22 21:43 UTC Marinos Yannikos <mjy@geizhals.at>
[12+ messages in thread]
Constraint exclusion can't process simple constant expressions?
2011-04-20 23:49 UTC Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
` Re: Constraint exclusion can't process simple constant expressions?
2011-04-21 00:48 UTC Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: Constraint exclusion can't process simple constant expressions?
2011-04-21 01:58 UTC Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
` Re: Constraint exclusion can't process simple constant expressions?
2011-04-21 02:05 UTC Brendan Jurd <direvus@gmail.com>
` Re: Constraint exclusion can't process simple constant expressions?
2011-04-21 02:13 UTC Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
` Re: Constraint exclusion can't process simple constant expressions?
2011-04-21 02:17 UTC Brendan Jurd <direvus@gmail.com>
` Re: Constraint exclusion can't process simple constant expressions?
2011-04-21 02:18 UTC Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
` Re: Constraint exclusion can't process simple constant expressions?
2011-04-21 02:44 UTC Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: Constraint exclusion can't process simple constant expressions?
2011-04-21 07:30 UTC Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
` Re: Constraint exclusion can't process simple constant expressions?
2011-04-21 07:34 UTC Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
` Re: Constraint exclusion can't process simple constant expressions?
2011-04-21 17:36 UTC Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
[11+ messages in thread]
rant ? check the BBWC
2011-04-21 02:14 UTC mark <dvlhntr@gmail.com>
Two different execution plans for similar requests
2011-03-01 08:46 UTC Joby Joba <jobyjoba59@gmail.com>
` Re: Two different execution plans for similar requests
2011-03-01 09:10 UTC tv@fuzzy.cz
` Re: Two different execution plans for similar requests
2011-03-01 09:25 UTC Joby Joba <jobyjoba59@gmail.com>
` Re: Two different execution plans for similar requests
2011-03-01 09:40 UTC tv@fuzzy.cz
` Re: Two different execution plans for similar requests
2011-03-01 12:37 UTC Joby Joba <jobyjoba59@gmail.com>
` Re: Two different execution plans for similar requests
2011-03-01 12:44 UTC Joby Joba <jobyjoba59@gmail.com>
` Re: Two different execution plans for similar requests
2011-03-01 17:07 UTC Maciek Sakrejda <msakrejda@truviso.com>
` Re: Two different execution plans for similar requests
2011-04-20 07:58 UTC Joby Joba <jobyjoba59@gmail.com>
[8+ messages in thread]
Background fsck
2011-04-06 22:33 UTC Ireneusz Pluta <ipluta@wp.pl>
` Re: Background fsck
2011-04-06 22:48 UTC Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
` Re: Background fsck
2011-04-06 22:59 UTC Ireneusz Pluta <ipluta@wp.pl>
` Re: Background fsck
2011-04-07 13:31 UTC Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>
` Re: Background fsck
2011-04-07 14:01 UTC Achilleas Mantzios <achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com>
` Re: Background fsck
2011-04-07 16:16 UTC Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com>
` Re: Background fsck
2011-04-08 05:55 UTC Ireneusz Pluta <ipluta@wp.pl>
` Re: Background fsck
2011-04-08 06:19 UTC Achilleas Mantzios <achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com>
` Re: Background fsck
2011-04-08 06:22 UTC Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
` Re: Background fsck
2011-04-08 09:34 UTC Ireneusz Pluta <ipluta@wp.pl>
` Re: Background fsck
2011-04-08 10:21 UTC Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>
` Re: Background fsck
2011-04-08 11:52 UTC Ireneusz Pluta <ipluta@wp.pl>
` Re: Background fsck
2011-04-08 11:53 UTC Ireneusz Pluta <ipluta@wp.pl>
` Re: Background fsck
2011-04-08 12:14 UTC Achilleas Mantzios <achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com>
` Re: Background fsck
2011-04-08 14:32 UTC Jochen Erwied <jochen@pgsql-performance.erwied.eu>
` Re: Background fsck
2011-04-08 16:12 UTC Ireneusz Pluta <ipluta@wp.pl>
` Re: Background fsck
2011-04-18 21:21 UTC Pierre C <lists@peufeu.com>
[17+ messages in thread]
Assessing performance of fetches
2011-04-18 18:12 UTC John Rouillard <rouilj@renesys.com>
` Re: Assessing performance of fetches
2011-04-18 19:41 UTC Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
[2+ messages in thread]
Select in subselect vs select = any array
2011-03-20 06:47 UTC Adam Tistler <atistler@gmail.com>
` Re: Select in subselect vs select = any array
2011-03-20 06:51 UTC Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
` Re: Select in subselect vs select = any array
2011-03-21 03:20 UTC Adam Tistler <atistler@gmail.com>
` Re: Select in subselect vs select = any array
2011-03-21 05:54 UTC Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
` Re: Select in subselect vs select = any array
2011-03-21 06:16 UTC Adam Tistler <atistler@gmail.com>
` Re: Select in subselect vs select = any array
2011-03-21 06:38 UTC Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
` Re: Select in subselect vs select = any array
2011-03-22 02:55 UTC mark <dvlhntr@gmail.com>
` Re: Select in subselect vs select = any array
2011-04-18 18:27 UTC Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
[8+ messages in thread]
Adding additional index causes 20,000x slowdown for certain select queries - postgres 9.0.3
2011-03-15 18:23 UTC Timothy Garnett <tgarnett@panjiva.com>
` Re: Adding additional index causes 20,000x slowdown for certain select queries - postgres 9.0.3
2011-03-15 18:39 UTC Timothy Garnett <tgarnett@panjiva.com>
` Re: Adding additional index causes 20,000x slowdown for certain select queries - postgres 9.0.3
2011-03-15 18:42 UTC Timothy Garnett <tgarnett@panjiva.com>
` Re: Adding additional index causes 20,000x slowdown for certain select queries - postgres 9.0.3
2011-03-16 16:40 UTC Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
` Re: Re: Adding additional index causes 20, 000x slowdown for certain select queries - postgres 9.0.3
2011-03-16 17:01 UTC Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: Adding additional index causes 20,000x slowdown for certain select queries - postgres 9.0.3
2011-03-16 17:05 UTC Shaun Thomas <sthomas@peak6.com>
` Re: Adding additional index causes 20, 000x slowdown for certain select queries - postgres 9.0.3
2011-03-16 17:38 UTC Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: Re: Adding additional index causes 20,000x slowdown for certain select queries - postgres 9.0.3
2011-03-16 17:44 UTC Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
` Re: Re: Adding additional index causes 20,000x slowdown for certain select queries - postgres 9.0.3
2011-03-16 18:34 UTC Shaun Thomas <sthomas@peak6.com>
` Re: Re: Adding additional index causes 20,000x slowdown for certain select queries - postgres 9.0.3
2011-03-16 18:39 UTC Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
` Re: Re: Adding additional index causes 20,000x slowdown for certain select queries - postgres 9.0.3
2011-03-16 19:42 UTC Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
` Re: Adding additional index causes 20,000x slowdown for certain select queries - postgres 9.0.3
2011-03-17 16:55 UTC Timothy Garnett <tgarnett@panjiva.com>
` Re: Adding additional index causes 20,000x slowdown for certain select queries - postgres 9.0.3
2011-03-17 18:13 UTC Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
` Re: Adding additional index causes 20,000x slowdown for certain select queries - postgres 9.0.3
2011-03-17 20:33 UTC Timothy Garnett <tgarnett@panjiva.com>
` Re: Adding additional index causes 20,000x slowdown for certain select queries - postgres 9.0.3
2011-04-18 16:51 UTC Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
[15+ messages in thread]
Custom operator class costs
2011-03-16 14:10 UTC Ben Beecher <benbeecher@gmail.com>
` Re: Custom operator class costs
2011-04-18 16:24 UTC Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
[2+ messages in thread]
Is there a way to selective dump of records in Postgres 9.0.3?
2011-04-18 15:05 UTC Sethu Prasad <sethuprasad.in@gmail.com>
` Re: Is there a way to selective dump of records in Postgres 9.0.3?
2011-04-18 15:11 UTC Nikolas Everett <nik9000@gmail.com>
` Re: Is there a way to selective dump of records in Postgres 9.0.3?
2011-04-18 16:01 UTC Samuel Gendler <sgendler@ideasculptor.com>
[3+ messages in thread]
Bad Query Plan with Range Query
2011-04-15 17:17 UTC Mark Williams <mark.williams@jivesoftware.com>
` Re: Bad Query Plan with Range Query
2011-04-15 17:38 UTC Kenneth Marshall <ktm@rice.edu>
` Re: Bad Query Plan with Range Query
2011-04-15 17:54 UTC Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
` Re: Bad Query Plan with Range Query
2011-04-15 18:06 UTC Mark Williams <mark.williams@jivesoftware.com>
` Re: Bad Query Plan with Range Query
2011-04-15 18:13 UTC Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
` Re: Bad Query Plan with Range Query
2011-04-15 22:29 UTC Mark Williams <mark.williams@jivesoftware.com>
[6+ messages in thread]
poor execution plan because column dependence
2011-04-12 23:23 UTC Václav Ovsík <vaclav.ovsik@i.cz>
` Re: poor execution plan because column dependence
2011-04-13 00:14 UTC Bob Lunney <bob_lunney@yahoo.com>
` Re: poor execution plan because column dependence
2011-04-13 00:52 UTC Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: poor execution plan because column dependence
2011-04-13 07:55 UTC Václav Ovsík <vaclav.ovsik@i.cz>
` Re: poor execution plan because column dependence
2011-04-13 08:21 UTC Václav Ovsík <vaclav.ovsik@i.cz>
` Re: poor execution plan because column dependence
2011-04-13 16:24 UTC Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: poor execution plan because column dependence
2011-04-14 08:11 UTC Václav Ovsík <vaclav.ovsik@i.cz>
` Re: poor execution plan because column dependence
2011-04-14 14:10 UTC Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: poor execution plan because column dependence
2011-04-15 07:59 UTC Václav Ovsík <vaclav.ovsik@i.cz>
[9+ messages in thread]
Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
2011-04-11 13:04 UTC Glyn Astill <glynastill@yahoo.co.uk>
` Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
2011-04-11 18:09 UTC Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
` Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
2011-04-11 18:12 UTC Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
` Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
2011-04-11 18:23 UTC Glyn Astill <glynastill@yahoo.co.uk>
` Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
2011-04-11 18:32 UTC Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
` Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
2011-04-11 19:29 UTC Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
` Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
2011-04-11 19:42 UTC Glyn Astill <glynastill@yahoo.co.uk>
` Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
2011-04-11 19:51 UTC Steve Clark <sclark@netwolves.com>
` Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
2011-04-11 19:56 UTC Jesper Krogh <jesper@krogh.cc>
` Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
2011-04-11 20:04 UTC david@lang.hm
` Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
2011-04-11 20:17 UTC Glyn Astill <glynastill@yahoo.co.uk>
` Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
2011-04-11 20:39 UTC James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>
` Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
2011-04-11 20:52 UTC Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
` Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
2011-04-11 21:06 UTC Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
` Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
2011-04-11 21:08 UTC Glyn Astill <glynastill@yahoo.co.uk>
` Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
2011-04-11 21:35 UTC Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
` Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
2011-04-11 22:11 UTC David Rees <drees76@gmail.com>
` Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
2011-04-12 00:05 UTC mark <dvlhntr@gmail.com>
` Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
2011-04-12 00:18 UTC Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
` Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
2011-04-12 00:18 UTC Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
` Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
2011-04-12 00:50 UTC mark <dvlhntr@gmail.com>
` Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
2011-04-12 01:59 UTC Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
` Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
2011-04-12 02:12 UTC Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
` Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
2011-04-12 05:17 UTC Jesper Krogh <jesper@krogh.cc>
` Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
2011-04-12 05:55 UTC Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
` Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
2011-04-12 07:31 UTC Arjen van der Meijden <acmmailing@tweakers.net>
` Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
2011-04-12 08:54 UTC Glyn Astill <glynastill@yahoo.co.uk>
` Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
2011-04-12 08:57 UTC Glyn Astill <glynastill@yahoo.co.uk>
` Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
2011-04-12 12:35 UTC Glyn Astill <glynastill@yahoo.co.uk>
` Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
2011-04-12 13:23 UTC Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
` Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
2011-04-12 13:24 UTC Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
` Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
2011-04-12 14:43 UTC Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
` Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
2011-04-12 16:01 UTC Glyn Astill <glynastill@yahoo.co.uk>
` Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
2011-04-12 16:07 UTC Glyn Astill <glynastill@yahoo.co.uk>
` Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
2011-04-12 16:12 UTC Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
` Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
2011-04-12 16:40 UTC Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
` Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
2011-04-12 16:43 UTC Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
` Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
2011-04-12 16:58 UTC F. BROUARD / SQLpro <sqlpro@club-internet.fr>
` Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
2011-04-12 17:00 UTC Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>
` Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
2011-04-12 17:10 UTC Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>
` Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
2011-04-12 17:14 UTC Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
` Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
2011-04-12 18:50 UTC Strange, John W <john.w.strange@jpmchase.com>
` Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
2011-04-13 09:48 UTC Glyn Astill <glynastill@yahoo.co.uk>
` Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
2011-04-13 16:33 UTC Scott Carey <scott@richrelevance.com>
` Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
2011-04-14 04:23 UTC Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>
` Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
2011-04-14 10:09 UTC Florian Weimer <fweimer@bfk.de>
` Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
2011-04-14 11:07 UTC Cédric Villemain <cedric.villemain.debian@gmail.com>
` Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
2011-04-14 20:05 UTC Scott Carey <scott@richrelevance.com>
` Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
2011-04-14 20:19 UTC Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
` Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
2011-04-14 22:42 UTC Scott Carey <scott@richrelevance.com>
` Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
2011-04-15 06:57 UTC Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
[51+ messages in thread]
Slow query postgres 8.3
2011-04-09 01:29 UTC Anne Rosset <arosset@collab.net>
` Re: Slow query postgres 8.3
2011-04-09 10:35 UTC tv@fuzzy.cz
` Re: Slow query postgres 8.3
2011-04-11 16:07 UTC Anne Rosset <arosset@collab.net>
` Re: Slow query postgres 8.3
2011-04-11 16:59 UTC Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
` Re: Slow query postgres 8.3
2011-04-12 07:33 UTC Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
` Re: Slow query postgres 8.3
2011-04-13 20:16 UTC Tomas Vondra <tv@fuzzy.cz>
` Re: Slow query postgres 8.3
2011-04-13 21:37 UTC Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
[7+ messages in thread]
Re: how explain works to Mr Nathan Boley
2011-04-11 23:22 UTC Radhya sahal <rad_cs_2006@yahoo.com>
` Re: how explain works to Mr Nathan Boley
2011-04-13 20:19 UTC Tomas Vondra <tv@fuzzy.cz>
[2+ messages in thread]
performance problem with LIMIT (order BY in DESC order). Wrong index used?
2011-04-12 05:20 UTC Dieter Rehbein <dieter.rehbein@skiline.cc>
` Re: performance problem with LIMIT (order BY in DESC order). Wrong index used?
2011-04-12 07:42 UTC Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
` Re: performance problem with LIMIT (order BY in DESC order). Wrong index used?
2011-04-12 08:59 UTC Dieter Rehbein <dieter.rehbein@skiline.cc>
` Re: performance problem with LIMIT (order BY in DESC order). Wrong index used?
2011-04-12 09:07 UTC Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
` Re: performance problem with LIMIT (order BY in DESC order). Wrong index used?
2011-04-12 09:33 UTC tv@fuzzy.cz
` Re: performance problem with LIMIT (order BY in DESC order). Wrong index used?
2011-04-12 09:36 UTC Dieter Rehbein <dieter.rehbein@skiline.cc>
` Re: performance problem with LIMIT (order BY in DESC order). Wrong index used?
2011-04-12 14:38 UTC Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
[7+ messages in thread]
Two servers - One Replicated - Same query
2011-04-11 23:28 UTC Ozer, Pam <pozer@automotive.com>
` Re: Two servers - One Replicated - Same query
2011-04-12 14:32 UTC Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
[2+ messages in thread]
how explain works
2011-04-11 23:02 UTC Radhya sahal <rad_cs_2006@yahoo.com>
` Re: how explain works
2011-04-11 23:09 UTC Nathan Boley <npboley@gmail.com>
[2+ messages in thread]
Postgres 9 slave lagging
2011-04-11 14:10 UTC Saurabh Agrawal <saurabh.miet@gmail.com>
` Re: Postgres 9 slave lagging
2011-04-11 22:39 UTC Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
[2+ messages in thread]
[next (older)]
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox