pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
[PERFORM] since when has pg_stat_user_indexes.idx_scan been counting?
  2011-05-12 15:39 UTC  Willy-Bas Loos <willybas@gmail.com>
` Re: since when has pg_stat_user_indexes.idx_scan been counting?
  2011-05-12 18:18 UTC  Tomas Vondra <tv@fuzzy.cz>
` Re: since when has pg_stat_user_indexes.idx_scan been counting?
  2011-05-12 18:19 UTC  Tomas Vondra <tv@fuzzy.cz>
` Re: [PERFORM] since when has pg_stat_user_indexes.idx_scan been counting?
  2011-05-12 18:22 UTC  raghu ram <raghuchennuru@gmail.com>
` Re: [PERFORM] since when has pg_stat_user_indexes.idx_scan been counting?
  2011-05-12 20:03 UTC  Willy-Bas Loos <willybas@gmail.com>
` Re: since when has pg_stat_user_indexes.idx_scan been counting?
  2011-05-12 20:06 UTC  Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>
` Re: since when has pg_stat_user_indexes.idx_scan been counting?
  2011-05-12 20:16 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: [ADMIN] since when has pg_stat_user_indexes.idx_scan been counting?
  2011-05-12 20:46 UTC  Tomas Vondra <tv@fuzzy.cz>
` Re: [ADMIN] since when has pg_stat_user_indexes.idx_scan been counting?
  2011-05-13 02:26 UTC  Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>
` Re: [ADMIN] since when has pg_stat_user_indexes.idx_scan been counting?
  2011-05-13 08:44 UTC  tv@fuzzy.cz
  [10+ messages in thread]

Checkpoint execution overrun impact?
  2011-04-22 09:21 UTC  drvillo <f.vivoli@gmail.com>
` Re: Checkpoint execution overrun impact?
  2011-05-12 03:36 UTC  Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
` Re: Checkpoint execution overrun impact?
  2011-05-13 02:10 UTC  Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>
  [3+ messages in thread]

tuning on ec2
  2011-04-26 15:15 UTC  Joel Reymont <joelr1@gmail.com>
` Re: tuning on ec2
  2011-05-12 03:38 UTC  Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
` Re: tuning on ec2
  2011-05-13 00:10 UTC  Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
  [3+ messages in thread]

'Interesting' prepared statement slowdown on large table join
  2011-05-11 11:08 UTC  Prodan, Andrei <Andrei.Prodan@awinta.com>
` Re: 'Interesting' prepared statement slowdown on large table join
  2011-05-11 15:55 UTC  Shaun Thomas <sthomas@peak6.com>
` Re: 'Interesting' prepared statement slowdown on large table join
  2011-05-11 16:38 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: 'Interesting' prepared statement slowdown on large table join
  2011-05-11 19:07 UTC  Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
` Re: 'Interesting' prepared statement slowdown on large table join
  2011-05-12 15:53 UTC  Prodan, Andrei <Andrei.Prodan@awinta.com>
` Re: 'Interesting' prepared statement slowdown on large table join
  2011-05-12 23:28 UTC  Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
  [6+ messages in thread]

HashJoin order, hash the large or small table?  Postgres likes to hash the big one, why?
  2010-10-19 01:40 UTC  Scott Carey <scott@richrelevance.com>
` Re: HashJoin order, hash the large or small table? Postgres likes to hash the big one, why?
  2010-10-19 03:43 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: HashJoin order, hash the large or small table? Postgres likes to hash the big one, why?
  2010-10-19 09:00 UTC  Scott Carey <scott@richrelevance.com>
` Re: HashJoin order, hash the large or small table? Postgres likes to hash the big one, why?
  2010-10-19 14:22 UTC  Mladen Gogala <mladen.gogala@vmsinfo.com>
` Re: HashJoin order, hash the large or small table? Postgres likes to hash the big one, why?
  2010-10-19 15:16 UTC  Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
` Re: HashJoin order, hash the large or small table? Postgres likes to hash the big one, why?
  2010-10-27 02:56 UTC  Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
` Re: HashJoin order, hash the large or small table? Postgres likes to hash the big one, why?
  2010-10-27 03:48 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: HashJoin order, hash the large or small table? Postgres likes to hash the big one, why?
  2010-10-27 19:25 UTC  Scott Carey <scott@richrelevance.com>
` Re: HashJoin order, hash the large or small table? Postgres likes to hash the big one, why?
  2010-10-27 19:56 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: HashJoin order, hash the large or small table? Postgres likes to hash the big one, why?
  2011-04-13 17:07 UTC  Scott Carey <scott@richrelevance.com>
` Re: HashJoin order, hash the large or small table? Postgres likes to hash the big one, why?
  2011-04-13 17:22 UTC  Scott Carey <scott@richrelevance.com>
` Re: HashJoin order, hash the large or small table? Postgres likes to hash the big one, why?
  2011-04-13 17:35 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: HashJoin order, hash the large or small table? Postgres likes to hash the big one, why?
  2011-04-13 18:27 UTC  Scott Carey <scott@richrelevance.com>
` Re: HashJoin order, hash the large or small table? Postgres likes to hash the big one, why?
  2011-04-15 15:15 UTC  pasman pasmański <pasman.p@gmail.com>
` Re: HashJoin order, hash the large or small table? Postgres likes to hash the big one, why?
  2011-05-12 03:21 UTC  Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
  [15+ messages in thread]

help speeding up a query in postgres 8.4.5
  2011-04-05 19:25 UTC  Maria L. Wilson <Maria.L.Wilson-1@nasa.gov>
` Re: help speeding up a query in postgres 8.4.5
  2011-04-06 11:41 UTC  Szymon Guz <mabewlun@gmail.com>
` Re: help speeding up a query in postgres 8.4.5
  2011-04-06 13:16 UTC  tv@fuzzy.cz
` Re: help speeding up a query in postgres 8.4.5
  2011-04-06 13:33 UTC  Maria L. Wilson <Maria.L.Wilson-1@nasa.gov>
` Re: help speeding up a query in postgres 8.4.5
  2011-04-06 13:36 UTC  Maria L. Wilson <Maria.L.Wilson-1@nasa.gov>
` Re: help speeding up a query in postgres 8.4.5
  2011-04-06 15:33 UTC  Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
` Re: help speeding up a query in postgres 8.4.5
  2011-04-06 15:37 UTC  Maria L. Wilson <Maria.L.Wilson-1@nasa.gov>
` Re: help speeding up a query in postgres 8.4.5
  2011-04-06 18:13 UTC  Tomas Vondra <tv@fuzzy.cz>
` Re: help speeding up a query in postgres 8.4.5
  2011-05-10 17:38 UTC  Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
` Re: help speeding up a query in postgres 8.4.5
  2011-05-10 17:47 UTC  Maria L. Wilson <Maria.L.Wilson-1@nasa.gov>
` Re: help speeding up a query in postgres 8.4.5
  2011-05-10 17:59 UTC  Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
` Re: help speeding up a query in postgres 8.4.5
  2011-05-10 18:20 UTC  Maria L. Wilson <Maria.L.Wilson-1@nasa.gov>
` Re: help speeding up a query in postgres 8.4.5
  2011-05-11 07:09 UTC  Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
` Re: help speeding up a query in postgres 8.4.5
  2011-05-11 12:01 UTC  Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
` Re: help speeding up a query in postgres 8.4.5
  2011-05-11 14:31 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
  [15+ messages in thread]

partition query on multiple cores
  2011-05-10 04:32 UTC  Didik Prasetyo <prasetyodidik62@yahoo.com>
` Re: partition query on multiple cores
  2011-05-10 15:06 UTC  Maciek Sakrejda <msakrejda@truviso.com>
` Re: partition query on multiple cores
  2011-05-10 16:22 UTC  Shaun Thomas <sthomas@peak6.com>
` Re: partition query on multiple cores
  2011-05-10 18:57 UTC  Tomas Vondra <tv@fuzzy.cz>
` Re: partition query on multiple cores
  2011-05-11 11:56 UTC  Mason S <masonlists@gmail.com>
` Re: partition query on multiple cores
  2011-05-11 12:04 UTC  Mason S <masonlists@gmail.com>
  [6+ messages in thread]

Postgres NoSQL emulation
  2011-05-10 17:56 UTC  Pierre C <lists@peufeu.com>
` Re: Postgres NoSQL emulation
  2011-05-10 21:32 UTC  Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
` Re: Postgres NoSQL emulation
  2011-05-11 03:13 UTC  Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
` Re: Postgres NoSQL emulation
  2011-05-11 11:14 UTC  Pierre C <lists@peufeu.com>
  [4+ messages in thread]

Question processor speed differences.
  2011-05-10 17:28 UTC  Tory M Blue <tmblue@gmail.com>
` Re: Question processor speed differences.
  2011-05-10 20:53 UTC  Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com>
  [2+ messages in thread]

Benchmarking a large server
  2011-05-09 20:32 UTC  Chris Hoover <revoohc@gmail.com>
` Re: Benchmarking a large server
  2011-05-09 20:50 UTC  Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
` Re: Benchmarking a large server
  2011-05-09 20:59 UTC  David Boreham <david_list@boreham.org>
` Re: Benchmarking a large server
  2011-05-09 20:59 UTC  Ben Chobot <bench@silentmedia.com>
` Re: Benchmarking a large server
  2011-05-09 21:01 UTC  Shaun Thomas <sthomas@peak6.com>
` Re: Benchmarking a large server
  2011-05-09 21:11 UTC  Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
` Re: Benchmarking a large server
  2011-05-09 21:13 UTC  David Boreham <david_list@boreham.org>
` Re: Benchmarking a large server
  2011-05-09 22:29 UTC  Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com>
` Re: Benchmarking a large server
  2011-05-09 23:52 UTC  Cédric Villemain <cedric.villemain.debian@gmail.com>
` Re: Benchmarking a large server
  2011-05-10 00:32 UTC  Craig James <craig_james@emolecules.com>
` Re: Benchmarking a large server
  2011-05-10 00:38 UTC  David Boreham <david_list@boreham.org>
` Re: Benchmarking a large server
  2011-05-10 00:45 UTC  Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>
` Re: Benchmarking a large server
  2011-05-10 00:46 UTC  david@lang.hm
` Re: Benchmarking a large server
  2011-05-10 03:13 UTC  Shaun Thomas <sthomas@peak6.com>
` Re: Benchmarking a large server
  2011-05-10 04:44 UTC  Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com>
` Re: Benchmarking a large server
  2011-05-10 06:58 UTC  Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga@gmail.com>
` Re: Benchmarking a large server
  2011-05-10 07:24 UTC  Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
` Re: Benchmarking a large server
  2011-05-10 14:24 UTC  Jeff <threshar@torgo.978.org>
` Re: Benchmarking a large server
  2011-05-10 15:19 UTC  Cédric Villemain <cedric.villemain.debian@gmail.com>
` Re: Benchmarking a large server
  2011-05-10 17:50 UTC  Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>
  [20+ messages in thread]

8.2.13 commit is taking too much time
  2011-05-10 07:01 UTC  AI Rumman <rummandba@gmail.com>
` Re: 8.2.13 commit is taking too much time
  2011-05-10 09:44 UTC  tv@fuzzy.cz
` Re: 8.2.13 commit is taking too much time
  2011-05-10 15:55 UTC  Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com>
  [3+ messages in thread]

indexes ignored when querying the master table
  2011-05-06 21:13 UTC  Thomas Hägi <th@refusion.com>
` Re: indexes ignored when querying the master table
  2011-05-09 07:57 UTC  Florian Weimer <fweimer@bfk.de>
` Re: indexes ignored when querying the master table
  2011-05-09 11:45 UTC  Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com>
` Re: indexes ignored when querying the master table
  2011-05-10 09:20 UTC  Thomas Hägi <th@refusion.com>
  [4+ messages in thread]

good performance benchmark
  2011-05-09 20:41 UTC  Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
` Re: good performance benchmark
  2011-05-09 23:23 UTC  Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
  [2+ messages in thread]

wildcard makes seq scan on prod db but not in test
  2011-05-09 18:06 UTC  Marcus Engene <mengpg2@engene.se>
` Re: wildcard makes seq scan on prod db but not in test
  2011-05-09 18:48 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: wildcard makes seq scan on prod db but not in test
  2011-05-09 18:57 UTC  Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
` Re: wildcard makes seq scan on prod db but not in	 test
  2011-05-09 19:11 UTC  Marcus Engene <mengpg2@engene.se>
` Re: wildcard makes seq scan on prod db but not in test
  2011-05-09 19:59 UTC  Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
` Re: wildcard makes seq scan on prod db but not in		 test
  2011-05-09 21:25 UTC  Marcus Engene <mengpg2@engene.se>
  [6+ messages in thread]

REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!)
  2011-03-19 03:07 UTC  Phoenix Kiula <phoenix.kiula@gmail.com>
` Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!)
  2011-03-19 04:58 UTC  Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
` Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!)
  2011-03-19 05:30 UTC  Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
` Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!)
  2011-03-20 08:04 UTC  Phoenix Kiula <phoenix.kiula@gmail.com>
` Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!)
  2011-03-21 13:28 UTC  Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
` Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!)
  2011-03-22 02:48 UTC  Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
` Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!)
  2011-04-17 15:30 UTC  Phoenix Kiula <phoenix.kiula@gmail.com>
` Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!)
  2011-04-17 15:44 UTC  Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
` Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!)
  2011-04-17 15:45 UTC  Jesper Krogh <jesper@krogh.cc>
` Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!)
  2011-04-17 16:09 UTC  Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
` Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!)
  2011-04-17 16:59 UTC  Phoenix <phoenix.kiula@gmail.com>
` Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!)
  2011-04-17 18:13 UTC  Alan Hodgson <ahodgson@simkin.ca>
` Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!)
  2011-04-17 18:30 UTC  Shashank Tripathi <shanx@shanx.com>
` Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!)
  2011-04-17 18:38 UTC  Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
` Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!)
  2011-04-18 05:14 UTC  Phoenix Kiula <phoenix.kiula@gmail.com>
` Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!)
  2011-04-18 05:19 UTC  Phoenix Kiula <phoenix.kiula@gmail.com>
` Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!)
  2011-04-18 06:39 UTC  Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
` Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!)
  2011-04-18 06:42 UTC  Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
` Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!)
  2011-04-18 07:26 UTC  Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
` Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!)
  2011-04-18 07:35 UTC  Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
` Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!)
  2011-04-18 07:38 UTC  Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
` Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!)
  2011-04-18 07:45 UTC  Phoenix Kiula <phoenix.kiula@gmail.com>
` Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!)
  2011-04-18 07:48 UTC  Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
` Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!)
  2011-04-18 11:15 UTC  Sethu Prasad <sethuprasad.in@gmail.com>
` Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!)
  2011-04-18 15:15 UTC  tv@fuzzy.cz
` Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!)
  2011-04-23 19:44 UTC  Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
` Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!)
  2011-04-30 08:07 UTC  Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com>
` Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!)
  2011-04-30 09:26 UTC  Phoenix Kiula <phoenix.kiula@gmail.com>
` Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!)
  2011-04-30 14:34 UTC  Kenneth Marshall <ktm@rice.edu>
` Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!)
  2011-05-04 13:28 UTC  Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net>
` Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!)
  2011-05-06 15:15 UTC  Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
  [31+ messages in thread]

VX_CONCURRENT flag on vxfs( 5.1 or later) for performance for postgresql?
  2011-04-28 03:33 UTC  HSIEN-WEN CHU <hsienwen.chu@googlemail.com>
` Re: VX_CONCURRENT flag on vxfs( 5.1 or later) for performance for postgresql?
  2011-04-28 13:25 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: VX_CONCURRENT flag on vxfs( 5.1 or later) for performance for postgresql?
  2011-04-29 00:14 UTC  Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com>
` Re: VX_CONCURRENT flag on vxfs( 5.1 or later) for performance for postgresql?
  2011-04-30 04:47 UTC  Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com>
` Re: VX_CONCURRENT flag on vxfs( 5.1 or later) for performance for postgresql?
  2011-04-30 08:51 UTC  Hsien-Wen Chu <chu.hsien.wen@gmail.com>
` Re: VX_CONCURRENT flag on vxfs( 5.1 or later) for performance for postgresql?
  2011-05-05 17:53 UTC  Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
` Re: VX_CONCURRENT flag on vxfs( 5.1 or later) for performance for postgresql?
  2011-05-06 10:53 UTC  Dimitri <dimitrik.fr@gmail.com>
  [7+ messages in thread]

Poor query plan chosen in 9.0.3 vs 8.3.7
  2011-05-05 17:43 UTC  Brian Connolly <bconn@labkey.com>
` Re: Poor query plan chosen in 9.0.3 vs 8.3.7
  2011-05-05 19:54 UTC  Brian Connolly <bconn@labkey.com>
` Re: Poor query plan chosen in 9.0.3 vs 8.3.7
  2011-05-05 20:01 UTC  Bosco Rama <postgres@boscorama.com>
` Re: Poor query plan chosen in 9.0.3 vs 8.3.7
  2011-05-05 20:27 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
  [4+ messages in thread]

ask the database engine tuning on the server
  2011-05-05 01:18 UTC  Didik Prasetyo <prasetyodidik62@yahoo.com>
` Re: ask the database engine tuning on the server
  2011-05-05 18:07 UTC  Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
  [2+ messages in thread]

Explicit joins
  2011-05-05 06:04 UTC  Rishabh Kumar Jain <rishabh.widu@yahoo.com>
` Re: Explicit joins
  2011-05-05 17:16 UTC  Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
  [2+ messages in thread]

amazon ec2
  2011-05-03 18:48 UTC  Joel Reymont <joelr1@gmail.com>
` Re: amazon ec2
  2011-05-03 19:41 UTC  Alan Hodgson <ahodgson@simkin.ca>
` Re: amazon ec2
  2011-05-03 19:43 UTC  Joel Reymont <joelr1@gmail.com>
` Re: amazon ec2
  2011-05-03 20:09 UTC  Alan Hodgson <ahodgson@simkin.ca>
` Re: amazon ec2
  2011-05-03 20:48 UTC  Mark Rostron <mrostron@ql2.com>
` Re: amazon ec2
  2011-05-03 20:52 UTC  Greg Spiegelberg <gspiegelberg@gmail.com>
` Re: amazon ec2
  2011-05-03 20:58 UTC  david@lang.hm
` Re: amazon ec2
  2011-05-03 21:39 UTC  Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
` Re: amazon ec2
  2011-05-03 22:39 UTC  Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>
` Re: amazon ec2
  2011-05-03 22:44 UTC  Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>
` Re: amazon ec2
  2011-05-04 13:05 UTC  Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net>
` Re: amazon ec2
  2011-05-04 14:04 UTC  Shaun Thomas <sthomas@peak6.com>
` Re: amazon ec2
  2011-05-05 00:02 UTC  Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
` Re: amazon ec2
  2011-05-05 00:12 UTC  david@lang.hm
` Re: amazon ec2
  2011-05-05 00:21 UTC  Denis de Bernardy <ddebernardy@yahoo.com>
` Re: amazon ec2
  2011-05-05 07:49 UTC  Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>
  [16+ messages in thread]

Shouldn't we have a way to avoid "risky" plans?
  2011-03-23 17:12 UTC  Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
` Re: Shouldn't we have a way to avoid "risky" plans?
  2011-03-23 17:35 UTC  Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
` Re: Shouldn't we have a way to avoid "risky" plans?
  2011-03-23 18:02 UTC  Justin Pitts <justinpitts@gmail.com>
` Re: Shouldn't we have a way to avoid "risky" plans?
  2011-03-23 20:29 UTC  Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
` Re: Shouldn't we have a way to avoid "risky" plans?
  2011-03-23 20:46 UTC  Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
` Re: Shouldn't we have a way to avoid "risky" plans?
  2011-03-23 21:00 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: Shouldn't we have a way to avoid "risky" plans?
  2011-03-23 21:08 UTC  Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
` Re: Shouldn't we have a way to avoid "risky" plans?
  2011-03-24 00:05 UTC  Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
` Re: Shouldn't we have a way to avoid "risky" plans?
  2011-03-24 08:44 UTC  Віталій Тимчишин <tivv00@gmail.com>
` Re: Shouldn't we have a way to avoid "risky" plans?
  2011-03-24 18:41 UTC  Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
` Re: Shouldn't we have a way to avoid "risky" plans?
  2011-03-24 20:30 UTC  Nathan Boley <npboley@gmail.com>
` Re: Shouldn't we have a way to avoid "risky" plans?
  2011-03-24 22:23 UTC  Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
` Re: Shouldn't we have a way to avoid "risky" plans?
  2011-03-25 09:43 UTC  Vitalii Tymchyshyn <tivv00@gmail.com>
` Re: Shouldn't we have a way to avoid "risky" plans?
  2011-03-25 14:12 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: Shouldn't we have a way to avoid "risky" plans?
  2011-03-25 14:24 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: Shouldn't we have a way to avoid "risky" plans?
  2011-03-25 14:41 UTC  Vitalii Tymchyshyn <tivv00@gmail.com>
` Re: Shouldn't we have a way to avoid "risky" plans?
  2011-03-25 17:55 UTC  Scott Carey <scott@richrelevance.com>
` Re: Shouldn't we have a way to avoid "risky" plans?
  2011-03-25 22:43 UTC  Nathan Boley <npboley@gmail.com>
` Re: Shouldn't we have a way to avoid "risky" plans?
  2011-03-26 01:03 UTC  Joshua Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
` Re: Shouldn't we have a way to avoid "risky" plans?
  2011-04-19 14:22 UTC  Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
` Re: Shouldn't we have a way to avoid "risky" plans?
  2011-04-19 14:29 UTC  Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
` Re: Shouldn't we have a way to avoid "risky" plans?
  2011-04-20 01:50 UTC  Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
` Re: Shouldn't we have a way to avoid "risky" plans?
  2011-04-23 16:11 UTC  Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
` Re: Shouldn't we have a way to avoid "risky" plans?
  2011-05-04 15:40 UTC  Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net>
  [24+ messages in thread]

row estimate very wrong for array type
  2011-05-04 13:40 UTC  Denis de Bernardy <ddebernardy@yahoo.com>
` Re: row estimate very wrong for array type
  2011-05-04 14:12 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: row estimate very wrong for array type
  2011-05-04 14:42 UTC  Denis de Bernardy <ddebernardy@yahoo.com>
` Re: row estimate very wrong for array type
  2011-05-04 14:56 UTC  Denis de Bernardy <ddebernardy@yahoo.com>
  [4+ messages in thread]

Order of tables
  2011-04-28 09:20 UTC  Rishabh Kumar Jain <rishabh.widu@yahoo.com>
` Re: Order of tables
  2011-04-28 12:30 UTC  Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com>
` Re: Order of tables
  2011-04-28 12:33 UTC  Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
` Re: Order of tables
  2011-04-29 10:50 UTC  Rishabh Kumar Jain <rishabh.widu@yahoo.com>
` Re: Order of tables
  2011-05-04 05:23 UTC  Rishabh Kumar Jain <rishabh.widu@yahoo.com>
` Re: Order of tables
  2011-05-04 05:26 UTC  Rishabh Kumar Jain <rishabh.widu@yahoo.com>
` Re: Order of tables
  2011-05-04 05:29 UTC  Rishabh Kumar Jain <rishabh.widu@yahoo.com>
` Re: Order of tables
  2011-05-04 05:30 UTC  Rishabh Kumar Jain <rishabh.widu@yahoo.com>
  [8+ messages in thread]

pgpoolAdmin handling several pgpool-II clusters
  2011-04-29 12:46 UTC  Jorgen <jrm@kms.dk>
` Re: pgpoolAdmin handling several pgpool-II clusters
  2011-04-30 01:27 UTC  Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp>
` Re: pgpoolAdmin handling several pgpool-II clusters
  2011-04-30 01:28 UTC  Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org>
` Re: pgpoolAdmin handling several pgpool-II clusters
  2011-05-03 05:32 UTC  Jorgen <jrm@kms.dk>
` Re: pgpoolAdmin handling several pgpool-II clusters
  2011-05-03 07:29 UTC  Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
` Re: pgpoolAdmin handling several pgpool-II clusters
  2011-05-03 08:16 UTC  Jorgen <jrm@kms.dk>
  [6+ messages in thread]

8.4.7, incorrect estimate
  2011-04-29 18:24 UTC  Wayne Conrad <wayne@databill.com>
` Re: 8.4.7, incorrect estimate
  2011-04-29 19:12 UTC  Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
` Re: 8.4.7, incorrect estimate
  2011-04-29 19:33 UTC  Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
` Re: 8.4.7, incorrect estimate
  2011-04-29 20:58 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: 8.4.7, incorrect estimate
  2011-05-02 13:19 UTC  Wayne Conrad <wconrad@yagni.com>
` Re: 8.4.7, incorrect estimate
  2011-05-02 15:11 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: 8.4.7, incorrect estimate
  2011-05-02 16:04 UTC  Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
` Re: 8.4.7, incorrect estimate
  2011-05-02 16:14 UTC  Wayne Conrad <wconrad@yagni.com>
  [8+ messages in thread]


[next (older)]

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox