public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedslony rpm help slony1-95-2.2.2-1.rhel6.x86_64
2016-06-03 23:03 UTC avi Singh <[email protected]>
` Re: slony rpm help slony1-95-2.2.2-1.rhel6.x86_64
2016-06-09 15:32 UTC Glyn Astill <[email protected]>
` Re: slony rpm help slony1-95-2.2.2-1.rhel6.x86_64
2016-07-17 01:14 UTC Jan Wieck <[email protected]>
[3+ messages in thread]
9.4 -> 9.5 regression with queries through pgbouncer on RHEL 6
2016-05-25 14:33 UTC Vladimir Borodin <[email protected]>
` Re: 9.4 -> 9.5 regression with queries through pgbouncer on RHEL 6
2016-05-27 16:57 UTC Vladimir Borodin <[email protected]>
` Re: 9.4 -> 9.5 regression with queries through pgbouncer on RHEL 6
2016-05-27 21:56 UTC Andres Freund <[email protected]>
` Re: 9.4 -> 9.5 regression with queries through pgbouncer on RHEL 6
2016-05-30 14:53 UTC Vladimir Borodin <[email protected]>
` Re: 9.4 -> 9.5 regression with queries through pgbouncer on RHEL 6
2016-05-30 17:03 UTC Vladimir Borodin <[email protected]>
` Re: 9.4 -> 9.5 regression with queries through pgbouncer on RHEL 6
2016-05-31 09:06 UTC Vladimir Borodin <[email protected]>
` Re: 9.4 -> 9.5 regression with queries through pgbouncer on RHEL 6
2016-06-02 11:18 UTC Антон Бушмелев <[email protected]>
` Re: 9.4 -> 9.5 regression with queries through pgbouncer on RHEL 6
2016-06-09 22:28 UTC Andres Freund <[email protected]>
` Re: [PERFORM] 9.4 -> 9.5 regression with queries through pgbouncer on RHEL 6
2016-06-12 21:42 UTC Vladimir Borodin <[email protected]>
` Re: [PERFORM] 9.4 -> 9.5 regression with queries through pgbouncer on RHEL 6
2016-06-12 21:51 UTC Andres Freund <[email protected]>
` Re: [PERFORM] 9.4 -> 9.5 regression with queries through pgbouncer on RHEL 6
2016-06-13 18:58 UTC Vladimir Borodin <[email protected]>
` Re: [HACKERS] 9.4 -> 9.5 regression with queries through pgbouncer on RHEL 6
2016-07-04 13:30 UTC Vladimir Borodin <[email protected]>
` Re: [PERFORM] 9.4 -> 9.5 regression with queries through pgbouncer on RHEL 6
2016-07-14 18:48 UTC Andres Freund <[email protected]>
` Re: [PERFORM] 9.4 -> 9.5 regression with queries through pgbouncer on RHEL 6
2016-07-14 18:53 UTC Andres Freund <[email protected]>
[14+ messages in thread]
Re: Tuning guidelines for server with 256GB of RAM and SSDs?
2016-07-05 19:17 UTC Mkrtchyan, Tigran <[email protected]>
` Re: Tuning guidelines for server with 256GB of RAM and SSDs?
2016-07-07 04:59 UTC Mark Kirkwood <[email protected]>
` Re: Tuning guidelines for server with 256GB of RAM and SSDs?
2016-07-07 07:49 UTC Kaixi Luo <[email protected]>
` Re: Tuning guidelines for server with 256GB of RAM and SSDs?
2016-07-07 14:09 UTC Wes Vaske (wvaske) <[email protected]>
` Re: Tuning guidelines for server with 256GB of RAM and SSDs?
2016-07-08 03:13 UTC Mark Kirkwood <[email protected]>
[5+ messages in thread]
Tuning guidelines for server with 256GB of RAM and SSDs?
2016-07-05 14:50 UTC Kaixi Luo <[email protected]>
` Re: Tuning guidelines for server with 256GB of RAM and SSDs?
2016-07-06 18:13 UTC Merlin Moncure <[email protected]>
` Re: Tuning guidelines for server with 256GB of RAM and SSDs?
2016-07-06 21:48 UTC Scott Marlowe <[email protected]>
` Re: Tuning guidelines for server with 256GB of RAM and SSDs?
2016-07-06 22:34 UTC Wes Vaske (wvaske) <[email protected]>
` Re: Tuning guidelines for server with 256GB of RAM and SSDs?
2016-07-07 16:27 UTC Merlin Moncure <[email protected]>
` Re: Tuning guidelines for server with 256GB of RAM and SSDs?
2016-07-07 17:00 UTC Scott Marlowe <[email protected]>
` Re: Tuning guidelines for server with 256GB of RAM and SSDs?
2016-07-07 21:06 UTC Kaixi Luo <[email protected]>
[7+ messages in thread]
pg_xlog dir not getting swept
2016-06-29 10:00 UTC Niels Kristian Schjødt <[email protected]>
` Re: pg_xlog dir not getting swept
2016-06-29 19:19 UTC Jeff Janes <[email protected]>
` Re: pg_xlog dir not getting swept
2016-06-30 09:36 UTC Niels Kristian Schjødt <[email protected]>
[3+ messages in thread]
testing - ignore
2016-06-28 14:10 UTC George Neuner <[email protected]>
[PERFORM] Cache performance decreases
2016-06-27 11:43 UTC Suren Arustamyan <[email protected]>
can't explain commit performance win7 vs linux : 8000/s vs 419/s
2016-06-25 16:19 UTC [email protected] <[email protected]>
` Re: can't explain commit performance win7 vs linux : 8000/s vs 419/s
2016-06-25 18:08 UTC Tom Lane <[email protected]>
` Re: can't explain commit performance win7 vs linux : 8000/s vs 419/s
2016-06-25 19:23 UTC Jeff Janes <[email protected]>
` Re: can't explain commit performance win7 vs linux : 8000/s vs 419/s
2016-06-25 22:27 UTC Imre Samu <[email protected]>
[4+ messages in thread]
Can't get two index scans
2016-06-22 16:03 UTC Craig James <[email protected]>
` Re: Can't get two index scans
2016-06-22 18:36 UTC Jeff Janes <[email protected]>
` Re: Can't get two index scans
2016-06-23 04:36 UTC Craig James <[email protected]>
` Re: Can't get two index scans
2016-06-23 15:47 UTC Jeff Janes <[email protected]>
` Re: Can't get two index scans
2016-06-23 19:52 UTC Craig James <[email protected]>
[5+ messages in thread]
Looking for more Beta Users!
2016-06-20 14:00 UTC jonescam <[email protected]>
Savepoint and Releasepoint in Logs
2016-06-17 15:19 UTC [email protected]
` Re: Savepoint and Releasepoint in Logs
2016-06-19 16:55 UTC Jeff Janes <[email protected]>
[2+ messages in thread]
Index not used
2016-06-16 07:58 UTC [email protected]
` Re: Index not used
2016-06-16 12:27 UTC John Gorman <[email protected]>
` Re: Index not used
2016-06-16 15:05 UTC Tom Lane <[email protected]>
` Re: Index not used
2016-06-16 15:53 UTC David G. Johnston <[email protected]>
` Re: Index not used
2016-06-19 09:59 UTC [email protected]
[5+ messages in thread]
9.6 query slower than 9.5.3
2016-06-17 01:56 UTC Adam Brusselback <[email protected]>
` Re: 9.6 query slower than 9.5.3
2016-06-17 02:04 UTC Tom Lane <[email protected]>
` Re: 9.6 query slower than 9.5.3
2016-06-17 02:09 UTC Adam Brusselback <[email protected]>
` Re: 9.6 query slower than 9.5.3
2016-06-17 02:14 UTC Adam Brusselback <[email protected]>
` Re: 9.6 query slower than 9.5.3
2016-06-17 02:45 UTC Tom Lane <[email protected]>
` Re: 9.6 query slower than 9.5.3
2016-06-17 03:36 UTC Adam Brusselback <[email protected]>
` Re: 9.6 query slower than 9.5.3
2016-06-17 03:57 UTC Tom Lane <[email protected]>
` Re: 9.6 query slower than 9.5.3
2016-06-17 04:07 UTC Adam Brusselback <[email protected]>
` Re: 9.6 query slower than 9.5.3
2016-06-17 15:18 UTC Adam Brusselback <[email protected]>
` Re: 9.6 query slower than 9.5.3
2016-06-17 15:22 UTC Tom Lane <[email protected]>
[10+ messages in thread]
Indexes for hashes
2016-06-15 09:34 UTC Ivan Voras <[email protected]>
` Re: Indexes for hashes
2016-06-15 12:45 UTC Torsten Zuehlsdorff <[email protected]>
` Re: Indexes for hashes
2016-06-15 13:03 UTC [email protected] <[email protected]>
` Re: Indexes for hashes
2016-06-15 13:09 UTC Ivan Voras <[email protected]>
` Re: Indexes for hashes
2016-06-15 13:16 UTC [email protected] <[email protected]>
` Re: Indexes for hashes
2016-06-15 13:38 UTC hubert depesz lubaczewski <[email protected]>
` Re: Indexes for hashes
2016-06-15 13:54 UTC Ivan Voras <[email protected]>
` Re: Indexes for hashes
2016-06-15 13:58 UTC julyanto SUTANDANG <[email protected]>
` Re: Indexes for hashes
2016-06-15 14:00 UTC Ivan Voras <[email protected]>
` Re: Indexes for hashes
2016-06-15 14:20 UTC Ivan Voras <[email protected]>
` Re: Indexes for hashes
2016-06-15 14:36 UTC Joshua D. Drake <[email protected]>
` Re: Indexes for hashes
2016-06-15 14:53 UTC [email protected] <[email protected]>
` Re: Indexes for hashes
2016-06-15 15:14 UTC Jeff Janes <[email protected]>
` Re: Indexes for hashes
2016-06-17 03:51 UTC Claudio Freire <[email protected]>
` Re: Indexes for hashes
2016-06-17 04:09 UTC julyanto SUTANDANG <[email protected]>
` Re: Indexes for hashes
2016-06-17 04:18 UTC Claudio Freire <[email protected]>
` Re: Indexes for hashes
2016-06-17 08:32 UTC Ivan Voras <[email protected]>
` Re: Indexes for hashes
2016-06-17 08:48 UTC julyanto SUTANDANG <[email protected]>
[18+ messages in thread]
Many-to-many performance problem
2016-06-10 13:04 UTC Rowan Seymour <[email protected]>
` Re: Many-to-many performance problem
2016-06-10 14:13 UTC Tom Lane <[email protected]>
` Re: Many-to-many performance problem
2016-06-10 14:27 UTC Yves Dorfsman <[email protected]>
` Re: Many-to-many performance problem
2016-06-10 15:23 UTC Tom Lane <[email protected]>
` Re: Many-to-many performance problem
2016-06-10 16:11 UTC Alex Ignatov <[email protected]>
` Re: Many-to-many performance problem
2016-06-16 08:29 UTC Rowan Seymour <[email protected]>
[6+ messages in thread]
pg_restore seems very slow
2016-06-15 22:00 UTC Adrian Myers <[email protected]>
` Re: pg_restore seems very slow
2016-06-15 22:08 UTC David G. Johnston <[email protected]>
` Re: pg_restore seems very slow
2016-06-15 23:41 UTC Adrian Myers <[email protected]>
` Re: pg_restore seems very slow
2016-06-16 01:43 UTC Adam Scott <[email protected]>
[4+ messages in thread]
Clarification on using pg_upgrade
2016-03-04 22:27 UTC Tory M Blue <[email protected]>
` Re: Clarification on using pg_upgrade
2016-03-04 22:58 UTC Justin Pryzby <[email protected]>
` Re: Clarification on using pg_upgrade
2016-03-11 16:46 UTC Jim Nasby <[email protected]>
` Re: Clarification on using pg_upgrade
2016-03-24 17:43 UTC Tory M Blue <[email protected]>
` Re: Clarification on using pg_upgrade
2016-04-03 17:13 UTC Jim Nasby <[email protected]>
` Re: Clarification on using pg_upgrade
2016-04-20 04:01 UTC Tory M Blue <[email protected]>
` Re: Clarification on using pg_upgrade
2016-06-14 21:03 UTC Jim Nasby <[email protected]>
` Re: Clarification on using pg_upgrade
2016-06-14 21:08 UTC Tory M Blue <[email protected]>
` Re: Clarification on using pg_upgrade
2016-06-15 10:14 UTC Glyn Astill <[email protected]>
[9+ messages in thread]
pg_database_size
2016-06-04 07:35 UTC sangeetha <[email protected]>
` Re: pg_database_size
2016-06-04 08:10 UTC Venkata Balaji N <[email protected]>
` Re: pg_database_size
2016-06-14 21:00 UTC Jim Nasby <[email protected]>
[3+ messages in thread]
array size exceeds the maximum allowed (1073741823) when building a json
2016-06-07 11:44 UTC Nicolas Paris <[email protected]>
` Re: array size exceeds the maximum allowed (1073741823) when building a json
2016-06-07 12:31 UTC David G. Johnston <[email protected]>
` Re: array size exceeds the maximum allowed (1073741823) when building a json
2016-06-07 12:36 UTC Nicolas Paris <[email protected]>
` Re: array size exceeds the maximum allowed (1073741823) when building a json
2016-06-07 12:39 UTC David G. Johnston <[email protected]>
` Re: array size exceeds the maximum allowed (1073741823) when building a json
2016-06-07 12:42 UTC Nicolas Paris <[email protected]>
` Re: array size exceeds the maximum allowed (1073741823) when building a json
2016-06-07 12:58 UTC David G. Johnston <[email protected]>
` Re: array size exceeds the maximum allowed (1073741823) when building a json
2016-06-07 13:03 UTC Josh Berkus <[email protected]>
` Re: array size exceeds the maximum allowed (1073741823) when building a json
2016-06-07 19:23 UTC Nicolas Paris <[email protected]>
` Re: array size exceeds the maximum allowed (1073741823) when building a json
2016-06-08 05:56 UTC Michael Paquier <[email protected]>
` Re: array size exceeds the maximum allowed (1073741823) when building a json
2016-06-08 06:04 UTC Tom Lane <[email protected]>
` Re: array size exceeds the maximum allowed (1073741823) when building a json
2016-06-09 13:31 UTC Merlin Moncure <[email protected]>
` Re: array size exceeds the maximum allowed (1073741823) when building a json
2016-06-09 13:43 UTC Nicolas Paris <[email protected]>
` Re: array size exceeds the maximum allowed (1073741823) when building a json
2016-06-09 20:36 UTC Merlin Moncure <[email protected]>
[13+ messages in thread]
Performance of LIKE/NOT LIKE when used in single query
2016-06-08 04:57 UTC Ed Felstein <[email protected]>
` Re: Performance of LIKE/NOT LIKE when used in single query
2016-06-08 05:33 UTC David G. Johnston <[email protected]>
` Re: Performance of LIKE/NOT LIKE when used in single query
2016-06-09 16:37 UTC Jeff Janes <[email protected]>
[3+ messages in thread]
Combination of partial and full indexes
2016-06-07 13:39 UTC Rafał Gutkowski <[email protected]>
` Re: Combination of partial and full indexes
2016-06-07 17:36 UTC Gerardo Herzig <[email protected]>
` Re: Combination of partial and full indexes
2016-06-08 08:52 UTC Rafał Gutkowski <[email protected]>
` Re: Combination of partial and full indexes
2016-06-08 09:01 UTC Rafał Gutkowski <[email protected]>
[4+ messages in thread]
Locking concurrency: select for update vs update
2016-06-07 07:31 UTC Streamsoft - Mirek Szajowski <[email protected]>
` Re: Locking concurrency: select for update vs update
2016-06-07 07:35 UTC Szymon Lipiński <[email protected]>
` Re: Locking concurrency: select for update vs update
2016-06-07 07:38 UTC Streamsoft - Mirek Szajowski <[email protected]>
` Re: Locking concurrency: select for update vs update
2016-06-07 13:24 UTC Tom Lane <[email protected]>
` Re: Locking concurrency: select for update vs update
2016-06-07 13:26 UTC Streamsoft - Mirek Szajowski <[email protected]>
[5+ messages in thread]
similarity and operator '%'
2016-05-30 17:53 UTC Volker Boehm <[email protected]>
` Re: similarity and operator '%'
2016-05-30 18:20 UTC David G. Johnston <[email protected]>
` Re: similarity and operator '%'
2016-05-30 20:05 UTC Jeff Janes <[email protected]>
[3+ messages in thread]
Planner chooses slow index heap scan despite accurate row estimates
2016-05-27 19:08 UTC Jake Magner <[email protected]>
` Re: Planner chooses slow index heap scan despite accurate row estimates
2016-05-27 23:17 UTC Tom Lane <[email protected]>
` Re: Planner chooses slow index heap scan despite accurate row estimates
2016-05-27 23:30 UTC Jake Magner <[email protected]>
` Re: Re: Planner chooses slow index heap scan despite accurate row estimates
2016-05-28 00:16 UTC Tom Lane <[email protected]>
` Re: Planner chooses slow index heap scan despite accurate row estimates
2016-05-29 00:38 UTC Jake Magner <[email protected]>
` Re: Re: Planner chooses slow index heap scan despite accurate row estimates
2016-05-30 19:34 UTC Jeff Janes <[email protected]>
[6+ messages in thread]
Testing in AWS, EBS
2016-05-25 22:34 UTC Tory M Blue <[email protected]>
` Re: Testing in AWS, EBS
2016-05-25 23:02 UTC Rayson Ho <[email protected]>
` Re: Testing in AWS, EBS
2016-05-25 23:56 UTC Yves Dorfsman <[email protected]>
` Re: Testing in AWS, EBS
2016-05-26 01:08 UTC Rayson Ho <[email protected]>
` Re: Testing in AWS, EBS
2016-05-26 08:41 UTC Artem Tomyuk <[email protected]>
` Re: Testing in AWS, EBS
2016-05-26 12:53 UTC Yves Dorfsman <[email protected]>
` Re: Testing in AWS, EBS
2016-05-26 13:00 UTC Artem Tomyuk <[email protected]>
` Re: Testing in AWS, EBS
2016-05-26 13:50 UTC Rayson Ho <[email protected]>
` Re: Testing in AWS, EBS
2016-05-26 14:00 UTC Artem Tomyuk <[email protected]>
` Re: Testing in AWS, EBS
2016-05-26 14:47 UTC Rayson Ho <[email protected]>
` Re: Testing in AWS, EBS
2016-05-26 14:52 UTC Artem Tomyuk <[email protected]>
` Re: Testing in AWS, EBS
2016-05-26 14:54 UTC Rayson Ho <[email protected]>
` Re: Testing in AWS, EBS
2016-05-26 15:03 UTC Artem Tomyuk <[email protected]>
` Re: Testing in AWS, EBS
2016-05-26 15:41 UTC Yves Dorfsman <[email protected]>
` Re: Testing in AWS, EBS
2016-05-26 21:26 UTC Rayson Ho <[email protected]>
[15+ messages in thread]
[next (older)]
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox