public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedReg pg_restore taking more time in windows compare to linux
2025-01-26 07:14 UTC Praveen Kumar Mandula <[email protected]>
` Re: Reg pg_restore taking more time in windows compare to linux
2025-01-27 08:53 UTC Laurenz Albe <[email protected]>
` Re: [EXTERNAL] - Re: Reg pg_restore taking more time in windows compare to linux
2025-01-27 12:29 UTC Praveen Kumar Mandula <[email protected]>
` Re: [EXTERNAL] - Re: Reg pg_restore taking more time in windows compare to linux
2025-01-27 15:06 UTC Laurenz Albe <[email protected]>
` Re: [EXTERNAL] - Re: Reg pg_restore taking more time in windows compare to linux
2025-01-28 17:12 UTC Laurenz Albe <[email protected]>
[5+ messages in thread]
Read-only connectios optimizatios
2025-01-25 14:55 UTC Edson Richter <[email protected]>
` Re: Read-only connectios optimizatios
2025-01-25 18:01 UTC Laurenz Albe <[email protected]>
` Re: Read-only connectios optimizatios
2025-01-25 22:12 UTC peter plachta <[email protected]>
` RE: [EXT] Re: Read-only connectios optimizatios
2025-01-27 17:41 UTC Wong, Kam Fook (TR Technology) <[email protected]>
[4+ messages in thread]
Any risk or overhead considerations for frequently executing queries against catalog tables?
2025-01-25 11:23 UTC Frits Hoogland <[email protected]>
` Re: Any risk or overhead considerations for frequently executing queries against catalog tables?
2025-01-25 13:32 UTC Pavel Stehule <[email protected]>
` Re: Any risk or overhead considerations for frequently executing queries against catalog tables?
2025-01-25 16:59 UTC Frits Hoogland <[email protected]>
` Re: Any risk or overhead considerations for frequently executing queries against catalog tables?
2025-01-25 18:18 UTC Pavel Stehule <[email protected]>
` Re: Any risk or overhead considerations for frequently executing queries against catalog tables?
2025-01-25 20:01 UTC Frits Hoogland <[email protected]>
` Re: Any risk or overhead considerations for frequently executing queries against catalog tables?
2025-01-25 22:08 UTC peter plachta <[email protected]>
` Re: Any risk or overhead considerations for frequently executing queries against catalog tables?
2025-01-25 22:42 UTC [email protected]
` Re: Any risk or overhead considerations for frequently executing queries against catalog tables?
2025-01-26 06:43 UTC Pavel Stehule <[email protected]>
` Re: Any risk or overhead considerations for frequently executing queries against catalog tables?
2025-01-26 17:56 UTC Jeremy Schneider <[email protected]>
[9+ messages in thread]
Query planning read a large amount of buffers for partitioned tables
2025-01-15 18:29 UTC bruno vieira da silva <[email protected]>
` Re: Query planning read a large amount of buffers for partitioned tables
2025-01-15 18:32 UTC bruno vieira da silva <[email protected]>
` Re: Query planning read a large amount of buffers for partitioned tables
2025-01-15 20:01 UTC David Rowley <[email protected]>
` Re: Query planning read a large amount of buffers for partitioned tables
2025-01-16 14:56 UTC bruno vieira da silva <[email protected]>
[4+ messages in thread]
Question: consolidating strpos searches?
2025-01-04 17:16 UTC James Addison <[email protected]>
` Re: Question: consolidating strpos searches?
2025-01-04 17:45 UTC Tom Lane <[email protected]>
` Re: Question: consolidating strpos searches?
2025-01-04 19:03 UTC Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]>
` Re: Question: consolidating strpos searches?
2025-01-15 23:58 UTC James Addison <[email protected]>
[4+ messages in thread]
Re: Aggressive vacuum
2025-01-07 19:30 UTC Jeff Janes <[email protected]>
Re: Aggressive vacuum
2025-01-06 23:18 UTC Slava Mudry <[email protected]>
Re: Reg. Postgres Unique contraint
2024-12-27 12:57 UTC [email protected]
RE: Reg. Postgres Unique contraint
2024-12-27 11:54 UTC [email protected]
RE: CTE Inline On TPC-DS Query 95
2024-12-27 11:34 UTC [email protected]
` Re: CTE Inline On TPC-DS Query 95
2024-12-27 11:40 UTC David Rowley <[email protected]>
[2+ messages in thread]
huge shared_blocks_hit one select but manually run very fast
2024-12-21 11:50 UTC James Pang <[email protected]>
` Re: huge shared_blocks_hit one select but manually run very fast
2024-12-21 16:40 UTC David Mullineux <[email protected]>
` Re: huge shared_blocks_hit one select but manually run very fast
2024-12-22 03:38 UTC James Pang <[email protected]>
` Re: huge shared_blocks_hit one select but manually run very fast
2024-12-25 14:07 UTC David Mullineux <[email protected]>
[4+ messages in thread]
Why a bitmap scan in this case?
2024-12-19 17:52 UTC Jon Zeppieri <[email protected]>
` Re: Why a bitmap scan in this case?
2024-12-19 18:38 UTC Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]>
` Re: Why a bitmap scan in this case?
2024-12-19 19:09 UTC Jon Zeppieri <[email protected]>
` Re: Why a bitmap scan in this case?
2024-12-19 19:19 UTC Jon Zeppieri <[email protected]>
` Re: Why a bitmap scan in this case?
2024-12-20 08:16 UTC Frédéric Yhuel <[email protected]>
` Re: Why a bitmap scan in this case?
2024-12-20 09:57 UTC Frédéric Yhuel <[email protected]>
` Re: Why a bitmap scan in this case?
2024-12-20 21:01 UTC Jon Zeppieri <[email protected]>
[7+ messages in thread]
Aggressive vacuum
2024-12-19 13:37 UTC Graham Hay <[email protected]>
PostgreSQL and a Catch-22 Issue related to dead rows
2024-12-09 11:02 UTC Lars Aksel Opsahl <[email protected]>
` Re: PostgreSQL and a Catch-22 Issue related to dead rows
2024-12-09 13:18 UTC [email protected] <[email protected]>
` Re: PostgreSQL and a Catch-22 Issue related to dead rows
2024-12-09 13:35 UTC Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]>
` Re: PostgreSQL and a Catch-22 Issue related to dead rows
2024-12-09 13:37 UTC Lars Aksel Opsahl <[email protected]>
` Re: PostgreSQL and a Catch-22 Issue related to dead rows
2024-12-09 13:56 UTC Lars Aksel Opsahl <[email protected]>
` Re: PostgreSQL and a Catch-22 Issue related to dead rows
2024-12-09 14:25 UTC Rick Otten <[email protected]>
` Re: PostgreSQL and a Catch-22 Issue related to dead rows
2024-12-09 14:32 UTC Christophe Pettus <[email protected]>
` Re: PostgreSQL and a Catch-22 Issue related to dead rows
2024-12-09 16:07 UTC Tom Lane <[email protected]>
` Re: PostgreSQL and a Catch-22 Issue related to dead rows
2024-12-10 05:19 UTC Lars Aksel Opsahl <[email protected]>
` Re: PostgreSQL and a Catch-22 Issue related to dead rows
2024-12-10 05:32 UTC Lars Aksel Opsahl <[email protected]>
` Re: PostgreSQL and a Catch-22 Issue related to dead rows
2024-12-10 08:55 UTC Lars Aksel Opsahl <[email protected]>
` Re: PostgreSQL and a Catch-22 Issue related to dead rows
2024-12-10 13:03 UTC Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]>
` Re: PostgreSQL and a Catch-22 Issue related to dead rows
2024-12-10 14:03 UTC Lars Aksel Opsahl <[email protected]>
` Re: PostgreSQL and a Catch-22 Issue related to dead rows
2024-12-10 15:31 UTC Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]>
` Re: PostgreSQL and a Catch-22 Issue related to dead rows
2024-12-10 20:26 UTC Hannu Krosing <[email protected]>
` Re: PostgreSQL and a Catch-22 Issue related to dead rows
2024-12-11 07:32 UTC Lars Aksel Opsahl <[email protected]>
` Re: PostgreSQL and a Catch-22 Issue related to dead rows
2024-12-11 13:29 UTC Lars Aksel Opsahl <[email protected]>
[17+ messages in thread]
can a blocked transaction affect the performance of one that is blocking it?
2024-12-09 18:42 UTC Eric Schwarzenbach <[email protected]>
` Re: can a blocked transaction affect the performance of one that is blocking it?
2024-12-09 23:10 UTC Nikolay Samokhvalov <[email protected]>
` Re: can a blocked transaction affect the performance of one that is blocking it?
2024-12-10 09:22 UTC David Mullineux <[email protected]>
[3+ messages in thread]
Performance of Query 60 on TPC-DS Benchmark
2024-11-22 11:12 UTC Ba Jinsheng <[email protected]>
` Re: Performance of Query 60 on TPC-DS Benchmark
2024-11-22 14:32 UTC Andrei Lepikhov <[email protected]>
` Re: Performance of Query 60 on TPC-DS Benchmark
2024-11-24 12:04 UTC Andrei Lepikhov <[email protected]>
` Re: Performance of Query 60 on TPC-DS Benchmark
2024-11-28 07:58 UTC Nikita Malakhov <[email protected]>
` Re: Performance of Query 60 on TPC-DS Benchmark
2024-11-29 14:27 UTC Nikita Malakhov <[email protected]>
[5+ messages in thread]
Reg. Postgres Unique contraint
2024-11-27 04:14 UTC Sajjad Abid <[email protected]>
` Re: Reg. Postgres Unique contraint
2024-11-27 04:18 UTC Diomedes Dominguez <[email protected]>
` Re: Reg. Postgres Unique contraint
2024-11-27 04:27 UTC Sajjad Abid <[email protected]>
` Re: Reg. Postgres Unique contraint
2024-11-27 06:22 UTC Burcin Yazici <[email protected]>
` Re: Reg. Postgres Unique contraint
2024-11-27 07:13 UTC Vitalii Tymchyshyn <[email protected]>
[5+ messages in thread]
Re: Has gen_random_uuid() gotten much slower in v17?
2024-11-20 10:35 UTC Frédéric Yhuel <[email protected]>
` Re: Has gen_random_uuid() gotten much slower in v17?
2024-11-20 15:46 UTC Tom Lane <[email protected]>
` Re: Has gen_random_uuid() gotten much slower in v17?
2024-11-20 22:11 UTC David Mullineux <[email protected]>
` Re: Has gen_random_uuid() gotten much slower in v17?
2024-11-20 22:26 UTC Tom Lane <[email protected]>
` Re: Has gen_random_uuid() gotten much slower in v17?
2024-11-26 15:23 UTC David Mullineux <[email protected]>
[5+ messages in thread]
CTE Inline On TPC-DS Query 95
2024-11-25 21:02 UTC Ba Jinsheng <[email protected]>
` Re: CTE Inline On TPC-DS Query 95
2024-11-26 04:03 UTC David Rowley <[email protected]>
[2+ messages in thread]
Performance of TPC-DS Query 95
2024-11-25 20:54 UTC Ba Jinsheng <[email protected]>
` Re: Performance of TPC-DS Query 95
2024-11-25 22:41 UTC David Rowley <[email protected]>
[2+ messages in thread]
Cardinality estimate of the inner relation
2024-11-22 15:53 UTC Frédéric Yhuel <[email protected]>
` Re: Cardinality estimate of the inner relation
2024-11-23 02:07 UTC Andrei Lepikhov <[email protected]>
` Re: Cardinality estimate of the inner relation
2024-11-25 12:46 UTC Frédéric Yhuel <[email protected]>
[3+ messages in thread]
could not send data to client: Connection reset by peer
2024-11-21 12:13 UTC James Pang <[email protected]>
` Re: could not send data to client: Connection reset by peer
2024-11-23 01:38 UTC Tomas Vondra <[email protected]>
[2+ messages in thread]
tds_fdw : Severe performance degradation from postgresql 10.23 to 16.4
2024-11-08 19:32 UTC Achilleas Mantzios <[email protected]>
` Re: tds_fdw : Severe performance degradation from postgresql 10.23 to 16.4
2024-11-09 10:49 UTC Tomas Vondra <[email protected]>
` Re: tds_fdw : Severe performance degradation from postgresql 10.23 to 16.4
2024-11-09 14:05 UTC Achilleas Mantzios <[email protected]>
` Re: tds_fdw : Severe performance degradation from postgresql 10.23 to 16.4
2024-11-09 14:08 UTC Achilleas Mantzios <[email protected]>
` Re: tds_fdw : Severe performance degradation from postgresql 10.23 to 16.4
2024-11-09 15:41 UTC Tomas Vondra <[email protected]>
` Re: tds_fdw : Severe performance degradation from postgresql 10.23 to 16.4
2024-11-10 09:45 UTC Achilleas Mantzios <[email protected]>
` Re: tds_fdw : Severe performance degradation from postgresql 10.23 to 16.4
2024-11-12 10:37 UTC Achilleas Mantzios - cloud <[email protected]>
` Re: tds_fdw : Severe performance degradation from postgresql 10.23 to 16.4
2024-11-12 13:17 UTC Tomas Vondra <[email protected]>
` Re: tds_fdw : Severe performance degradation from postgresql 10.23 to 16.4
2024-11-12 18:24 UTC Achilleas Mantzios <[email protected]>
` Re: tds_fdw : Severe performance degradation from postgresql 10.23 to 16.4
2024-11-12 19:37 UTC Tom Lane <[email protected]>
` Re: tds_fdw : Severe performance degradation from postgresql 10.23 to 16.4
2024-11-12 21:46 UTC Tomas Vondra <[email protected]>
` Re: tds_fdw : Severe performance degradation from postgresql 10.23 to 16.4
2024-11-13 07:14 UTC Achilleas Mantzios - cloud <[email protected]>
` Re: tds_fdw : Severe performance degradation from postgresql 10.23 to 16.4
2024-11-13 08:45 UTC Achilleas Mantzios - cloud <[email protected]>
[13+ messages in thread]
Performance of Query 4 on TPC-DS Benchmark
2024-11-10 19:35 UTC Ba Jinsheng <[email protected]>
` Re: Performance of Query 4 on TPC-DS Benchmark
2024-11-10 19:58 UTC Thomas Munro <[email protected]>
` Re: Performance of Query 4 on TPC-DS Benchmark
2024-11-10 20:16 UTC Alena Rybakina <[email protected]>
` Re: Performance of Query 4 on TPC-DS Benchmark
2024-11-10 20:18 UTC Alena Rybakina <[email protected]>
` Re: Performance of Query 4 on TPC-DS Benchmark
2024-11-11 09:41 UTC Andrei Lepikhov <[email protected]>
` Re: Performance of Query 4 on TPC-DS Benchmark
2024-11-11 10:49 UTC Ba Jinsheng <[email protected]>
` Re: Performance of Query 4 on TPC-DS Benchmark
2024-11-11 10:51 UTC Ba Jinsheng <[email protected]>
` Re: Performance of Query 4 on TPC-DS Benchmark
2024-11-12 10:40 UTC Andrei Lepikhov <[email protected]>
[8+ messages in thread]
Major performance degradation with joins in 15.8 or 15.7?
2024-11-07 21:54 UTC Ed Sabol <[email protected]>
` Re: Major performance degradation with joins in 15.8 or 15.7?
2024-11-07 22:18 UTC David Rowley <[email protected]>
` Re: Major performance degradation with joins in 15.8 or 15.7?
2024-11-08 01:21 UTC Ed Sabol <[email protected]>
` Re: Major performance degradation with joins in 15.8 or 15.7?
2024-11-08 02:27 UTC Andrei Lepikhov <[email protected]>
` Re: Major performance degradation with joins in 15.8 or 15.7?
2024-11-08 02:45 UTC Ed Sabol <[email protected]>
` Re: Major performance degradation with joins in 15.8 or 15.7?
2024-11-08 02:54 UTC Andrei Lepikhov <[email protected]>
` Re: Major performance degradation with joins in 15.8 or 15.7?
2024-11-08 20:32 UTC Ed Sabol <[email protected]>
` Re: Major performance degradation with joins in 15.8 or 15.7?
2024-11-09 01:21 UTC Andrei Lepikhov <[email protected]>
[8+ messages in thread]
[next (older)]
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox