From: Michael Glaesemann <grzm@seespotcode.net>
To: Gauri Kanekar <meetgaurikanekar@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Vacuum v/s Autovacuum
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 22:31:10 +0900
Message-ID: <A9D4D3AB-FB33-47BF-A354-4064DF38293C@seespotcode.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7e4ba9550701180524h5ebe3390v73292cb91aed89fa@mail.gmail.com>
References: <7e4ba9550701180524h5ebe3390v73292cb91aed89fa@mail.gmail.com>
On Jan 18, 2007, at 22:24 , Gauri Kanekar wrote:
> is autovacuum similar to vacuum full analyse verbose.
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/interactive/routine-
vacuuming.html#AUTOVACUUM
Apparently, no FULL, no VERBOSE (which is only really useful if you
want to see the results, not for routine maintenance).
Michael Glaesemann
grzm seespotcode net
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: grzm@seespotcode.net, meetgaurikanekar@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Vacuum v/s Autovacuum
In-Reply-To: <A9D4D3AB-FB33-47BF-A354-4064DF38293C@seespotcode.net>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox