pg.ddx.io pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archivehelp / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: postgresql performance list <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: PITR performance costs
Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 14:48:55 -0400
Message-ID: <AB783D40-6095-40EB-A779-B3387EF87136@fastcrypt.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <465B03E5.1000109@enterprisedb.com>
References: <81165B3E-1099-4388-88F1-FA27A3AD92BC@fastcrypt.com>
<465B03E5.1000109@enterprisedb.com>
Heikki,
Don't the archived logs have to be copied as well as the regular WAL
logs get recycled ?
Dave
On 28-May-07, at 12:31 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Dave Cramer wrote:
>> Since PITR has to enable archiving does this not increase the
>> amount of disk I/O required ?
>
> There's no difference in normal DML operations, but some bulk
> operations like CREATE INDEX that don't otherwise generate WAL,
> need to be WAL logged when archiving is enabled.
>
> --
> Heikki Linnakangas
> EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
view thread (8+ messages) latest in thread
Message-ID: <AB783D40-6095-40EB-A779-B3387EF87136@fastcrypt.com> Permalink: ../AB783D40-6095-40EB-A779-B3387EF87136@fastcrypt.com/ Also on: postgresql.org/message-id/AB783D40-6095-40EB-A779-B3387EF87136@fastcrypt.com ·
reply
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options: reply via email To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Cc: pg@fastcrypt.com, heikki@enterprisedb.com Subject: Re: PITR performance costs In-Reply-To: <AB783D40-6095-40EB-A779-B3387EF87136@fastcrypt.com> * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox