pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>
To: Michael Ben-Nes <miki@canaan.co.il>
Cc: PFC <lists@boutiquenumerique.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Advice on RAID card
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 10:57:56 -0400
Message-ID: <ABE6B997-2C1E-43B1-9F18-28F54B1620FE@fastcrypt.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43367937.40809@canaan.co.il>
References: <IGEGINLEEDLANNHAAKCMOECJCCAA.gaulakh@ecmarket.com>
	<op.sxll3du6th1vuj@localhost>
	<43367937.40809@canaan.co.il>

I would think software raid would be quite inappropriate considering  
postgres when it is working is taking a fair amount of CPU as would  
software RAID. Does anyone know if this is really the case ?

Dave
On 25-Sep-05, at 6:17 AM, Michael Ben-Nes wrote:

> I would consider Software Raid
>
>
> PFC wrote:
>
>
>>
>>     Hello fellow Postgresql'ers.
>>
>>     I've been stumbled on this RAID card which looks nice. It is a  
>> PCI-X SATA  Raid card with 6 channels, and does RAID  0,1,5,10,50.
>>     It is a HP card with an Adaptec chip on it, and 64 MB cache.
>>
>>     HP Part # : 372953-B21
>>     Adaptec Part # : AAR-2610SA/64MB/HP
>>
>>     There' even a picture :
>>     http://megbytes.free.fr/Sata/DSC05970.JPG
>>
>>     I know it isn't as good as a full SCSI system. I just want to  
>> know if  some of you have had experiences with these, and if this  
>> cards belong to  the "slower than no RAID" camp, like some DELL  
>> card we often see mentioned  here, or to the "decent performance  
>> for the price" camp. It is to run on a  Linux.
>>
>>     Thanks in advance for your time and information.
>>
>> ---------------------------(end of  
>> broadcast)---------------------------
>> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>>
>>               http://archives.postgresql.org
>>
>
>
> -- 
> --------------------------
> Canaan Surfing Ltd.
> Internet Service Providers
> Ben-Nes Michael - Manager
> Tel: 972-4-6991122
> Cel: 972-52-8555757
> Fax: 972-4-6990098
> http://www.canaan.net.il
> --------------------------
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of  
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
>       choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
>       match
>
>




view thread (18+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <ABE6B997-2C1E-43B1-9F18-28F54B1620FE@fastcrypt.com>
Permalink:  ../ABE6B997-2C1E-43B1-9F18-28F54B1620FE@fastcrypt.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/ABE6B997-2C1E-43B1-9F18-28F54B1620FE@fastcrypt.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: pg@fastcrypt.com, miki@canaan.co.il, lists@boutiquenumerique.com
  Subject: Re: Advice on RAID card
  In-Reply-To: <ABE6B997-2C1E-43B1-9F18-28F54B1620FE@fastcrypt.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox