pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>
To: Guillaume Cottenceau <gc@mnc.ch>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: increasing shared buffers: how much should be removed from OS filesystem cache?
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 11:14:44 -0400
Message-ID: <B144680C-302F-404A-845A-321FAD59DABF@fastcrypt.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87fyf7hm2e.fsf@meuh.mnc.lan>
References: <87veo7a5dn.fsf@meuh.mnc.lan>
	<3743D7B4-2749-41C3-ADE1-39B86F7C98D4@fastcrypt.com>
	<87fyf7hm2e.fsf@meuh.mnc.lan>


On 4-Sep-06, at 8:07 AM, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:

> Dave Cramer <pg 'at' fastcrypt.com> writes:
>
>> Guillaume
>>
>> 1G is really not a significant amount of memory these days,
>
> Yeah though we have 2G or 4G of RAM in our servers (and not only
> postgres running on it).
>
>> That said 6-10% of available memory should be given to an 8.0 or
>> older version of postgresql
>>
>> Newer versions work better around 25%
>>
>> I'm not sure what you mean by mechanically removed from  
>> effective_cache
>
> I mean that when you allocate more memory to applications, the
> consequence is less memory the OS will be able to use for disk
> cache.
>
>> effective cache is really a representation of shared buffers plus OS
>> cache
>
> Are you sure the shared buffers should be counted in? As I
> understand the documentation, they should not (as shared buffers
> is allocated memory for the OS, not part of "kernel's disk
> cache"):
Yes, I am sure this should be counted, however effective_cache is not  
actually allocating anything so it doesn't have to be exact, but it  
has to be in the correct order of magnitude
>
>     Sets the planner's assumption about the effective size of the
>     disk cache (that is, the portion of the kernel's disk cache
>     that will be used for PostgreSQL data files). This is
>     measured in disk pages, which are normally 8192 bytes each.
>     The default is 1000.
>
> -- 
> Guillaume Cottenceau
> Create your personal SMS or WAP Service - visit http:// 
> mobilefriends.ch/
>




view thread (10+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <B144680C-302F-404A-845A-321FAD59DABF@fastcrypt.com>
Permalink:  ../B144680C-302F-404A-845A-321FAD59DABF@fastcrypt.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/B144680C-302F-404A-845A-321FAD59DABF@fastcrypt.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: pg@fastcrypt.com, gc@mnc.ch
  Subject: Re: increasing shared buffers: how much should be removed from OS filesystem cache?
  In-Reply-To: <B144680C-302F-404A-845A-321FAD59DABF@fastcrypt.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox