From: Brian Karlak <zenkat@metaweb.com>
To: Craig Ringer <craig@postnewspapers.com.au>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: maintaining a reference to a fetched row
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 16:12:44 -0800
Message-ID: <B531CFC7-0DF2-46DF-B9F2-C6AC97816933@metaweb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AF0C4E4.2080902@postnewspapers.com.au>
References: <22AC581D-50D1-4863-9FDE-35EDDB171269@metaweb.com>
<4AF0C4E4.2080902@postnewspapers.com.au>
On Nov 3, 2009, at 4:03 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:
> I don't have a good answer for you there. Perhaps using Pg's locking
> to
> do your queueing, rather than updating a status flag, might let you
> use
> a cursor? Have a look at the list archives - there's been a fair bit
> of
> discussion of queuing mechanisms.
This is an interesting idea. I'll see what I can find in the
archives. It will likely take a bit of refactoring, but such is
life ...
Thanks!
Brian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: zenkat@metaweb.com, craig@postnewspapers.com.au
Subject: Re: maintaining a reference to a fetched row
In-Reply-To: <B531CFC7-0DF2-46DF-B9F2-C6AC97816933@metaweb.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox