pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adam Witney <awitney@sghms.ac.uk>
To: pgsql-performance <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Hardware advice
Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 15:23:28 +0100
Message-ID: <BAFD27F0.1C94E%a.witney@sghms.ac.uk> (raw)

Hi,

I am in the process of pricing up boxes for our database, and I was
wondering if anyone had any recommendations or comments.

The database itself will have around 100-150 users mostly accessing through
a PHP/apache interface. I don't expect lots of simultaneous activity,
however users will often be doing multiple table joins (can be up to 10-15
tables in one query). Also they will often be pulling out on the order of
250,000 rows (5-10 numeric fields per row), processing the data (I may split
this to a second box) and then writing back ~20,000 rows of data (2-3
numeric fields per row).

Estimating total amount of data is quite tricky, but it could grow to
100-250Gb over the next 3 years.

I have priced one box from the Dell web site as follows

Single Intel Xeon 2.8GHz with 512kb L2 cache
2GB RAM

36Gb 10,000rpm Ultra 3 160 SCSI
36Gb 10,000rpm Ultra 3 160 SCSI
146Gb 10,000rpm U320 SCSI
146Gb 10,000rpm U320 SCSI
146Gb 10,000rpm U320 SCSI

PERC 3/DC RAID Controller (128MB Cache)

RAID1 for 2x 36Gb drives
RAID5 for 3x 146Gb drives

Running RedHat Linux 8.0

This configuration would be pretty much the top of our budget (~ £5k).

I was planning on having the RAID1 setup for the OS and then the RAID5 for
the db files.

Would it be better to have a dual 2.4GHz setup rather than a single 2.8GHz
or would it not make much difference?

Does the RAID setup look ok, or would anyone forsee problems in this
context? (This machine can take a maximum of 5 internal drives).

Am I overdoing any particular component at the expense of another?

Any other comments would be most welcome.

Thanks for any help

Adam


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.




view thread (60+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <BAFD27F0.1C94E%a.witney@sghms.ac.uk>
Permalink:  ../BAFD27F0.1C94E%25a.witney@sghms.ac.uk/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/BAFD27F0.1C94E%a.witney@sghms.ac.uk

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: awitney@sghms.ac.uk
  Subject: Re: Hardware advice
  In-Reply-To: <BAFD27F0.1C94E%a.witney@sghms.ac.uk>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox