pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cora Ma <machengcheng001@hotmail.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: performance degradation after launching postgres cluster using pgpool-II
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 00:29:42 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <BAY178-W330469ED6991737FB8C07F2540@phx.gbl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140407.224610.2291121243020563456.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp>
References: <1396254699987-5797953.post@n5.nabble.com>
	<20140407.224610.2291121243020563456.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp>
List-Unsubscribe:  <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-performance>

Feeling a little sorry about replying you later.
Then, I want to say so many thanks for this advice, cause we pointed our jobserver to the master directly and then the performance issues resolved. My client is so curious that why pgpool doesn't support so welcome platform like java. Hoping it can get improved in the following versions.
So, besides pgpool, do you have any other solutions for postgresql cluster?
Thanks a lot,Cora

Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 06:47:13 -0700
From: ml-node+s1045698n5798972h16@n5.nabble.com
To: machengcheng001@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: performance degradation after launching postgres cluster using pgpool-II



	> Before starting the cluster, one bulk updates through java code would cost

> about 1 hour to finish, but then it would take twice amount of time.


pgpool-II is not very good at handling extended protocol (mostly used

in Java). If you need to execute large updates, you'd better to

connect to PostgreSQL directly. Note that there's no problem that some

sessions connect via pgpool-II, while others directly connect

PostgreSQL.


Best regards,

--

Tatsuo Ishii

SRA OSS, Inc. Japan

English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp


-- 

Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list ([hidden email])

To make changes to your subscription:

http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance


	
	
	
	

	

	
	
		If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
		http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/performance-degradation-after-launching-postgres-cluster-usi...
	
	
		
		To unsubscribe from performance degradation after launching postgres cluster using pgpool-II, click here.

		NAML
	 		 	   		  



--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/performance-degradation-after-launching-postgres-cluster-usi...
Sent from the PostgreSQL - performance mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

view thread (3+ messages)

Message-ID: <BAY178-W330469ED6991737FB8C07F2540@phx.gbl>
Permalink:  ../BAY178-W330469ED6991737FB8C07F2540@phx.gbl/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/BAY178-W330469ED6991737FB8C07F2540@phx.gbl

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: machengcheng001@hotmail.com
  Subject: Re: performance degradation after launching postgres cluster using pgpool-II
  In-Reply-To: <BAY178-W330469ED6991737FB8C07F2540@phx.gbl>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox