pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Davis <sdavis2@mail.nih.gov>
To: NSO <nso@fmf.vtu.lt>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Bytea poor performance
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 09:40:28 -0400
Message-ID: <BF767F0C.10CEA%sdavis2@mail.nih.gov> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17260.81.7.89.65.1129382454.squirrel@fmf.vtu.lt>

On 10/15/05 9:20 AM, "NSO" <nso@fmf.vtu.lt> wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> I am trying to select form table with bytea field. And queries runs very
> slow.
> My table:
> CREATE TABLE files (file bytea, nr serial NOT NULL) WITH OIDS;
> 
> Query:
> select * from files where nr > 1450
> 
> (I have total 1500 records in it, every holds picture of 23kB size)
> Query runs very long:
> Total query runtime: 23625 ms.
> Data retrieval runtime: 266 ms.
> 50 rows retrieved.
> 
> explain:
> Index Scan using pk on files  (cost=0.00..3.67 rows=50 width=36)
> Index Cond: (nr > 1450)
> 
> Is it possible to do something with it? or it is normal? Our server is
> fast, and all other tables work fine..

How about some explain analyze output?  Have you done a full vacuum lately?
How about reindexing?

Sean




view thread (14+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <BF767F0C.10CEA%sdavis2@mail.nih.gov>
Permalink:  ../BF767F0C.10CEA%25sdavis2@mail.nih.gov/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/BF767F0C.10CEA%sdavis2@mail.nih.gov

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: sdavis2@mail.nih.gov, nso@fmf.vtu.lt
  Subject: Re: Bytea poor performance
  In-Reply-To: <BF767F0C.10CEA%sdavis2@mail.nih.gov>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox