From: Luke Lonergan <llonergan@greenplum.com>
To: Vivek Khera <vivek@khera.org>
To: Postgresql Performance <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 08:20:11 -0800
Message-ID: <BFA33F3B.1404F%llonergan@greenplum.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7F33229E-AE95-436B-AB2F-01AC023DD7EE@khera.org>
Vivek,
On 11/18/05 8:05 AM, "Vivek Khera" <vivek@khera.org> wrote:
> I can tell you from direct personal experience that you're just plain
> wrong.
>
> up with my load on a 60+ GB database. The Dual opteron system has
I¹m always surprised by what passes for a large database. The poster is
talking about 5,000GB, or almost 100 times the data you have.
Post your I/O numbers on sequential scan. Sequential scan is critical for
Decision Support / Data Warehousing.
- Luke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: llonergan@greenplum.com, vivek@khera.org
Subject: Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (
In-Reply-To: <BFA33F3B.1404F%llonergan@greenplum.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox