From: Luke Lonergan <llonergan@greenplum.com>
To: Mark Kirkwood <markir@paradise.net.nz>
Cc: Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>
Cc: Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>
Cc: Joshua Marsh <icub3d@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 16:05:59 -0800
Message-ID: <BFA3AC67.14125%llonergan@greenplum.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <437E67EE.4070605@paradise.net.nz>
Mark,
On 11/18/05 3:46 PM, "Mark Kirkwood" <markir@paradise.net.nz> wrote:
> If you alter this to involve more complex joins (e.g 4. way star) and
> (maybe add a small number of concurrent executors too) - is it still the
> case?
I may not have listened to you - are you asking about whether the readahead
works for these cases?
I¹ll be running some massive TPC-H benchmarks on these machines soon we¹ll
see then.
- Luke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: llonergan@greenplum.com, markir@paradise.net.nz, pg@fastcrypt.com, gsstark@mit.edu, icub3d@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (
In-Reply-To: <BFA3AC67.14125%llonergan@greenplum.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox