pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luke Lonergan <llonergan@greenplum.com>
To: stange@rentec.com
Cc: Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>
Cc: Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>
Cc: Joshua Marsh <icub3d@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 15:44:35 -0800
Message-ID: <BFA79BE3.14369%llonergan@greenplum.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <438241E5.2010701@rentec.com>

Alan,

Unless noted otherwise all results posted are for block device readahead set
to 16M using "blockdev --setra=16384 <block_device>".  All are using the
2.6.9-11 Centos 4.1 kernel.

For those who don't have lmdd, here is a comparison of two results on an
ext2 filesystem:

============================================================================
[root@modena1 dbfast1]# time bash -c "(dd if=/dev/zero of=/dbfast1/bigfile
bs=8k count=800000 && sync)"
800000+0 records in
800000+0 records out

real    0m33.057s
user    0m0.116s
sys     0m13.577s

[root@modena1 dbfast1]# time lmdd if=/dev/zero of=/dbfast1/bigfile bs=8k
count=800000 sync=1
6553.6000 MB in 31.2957 secs, 209.4092 MB/sec

real    0m33.032s
user    0m0.087s
sys     0m13.129s
============================================================================

So lmdd with sync=1 is apparently equivalent to a sync after a dd.

I use 2x memory with dd for the *READ* performance testing, but let's make
sure things are synced on both sides for this set of comparisons.

First, let's test ext2 versus "ext3, data=ordered", versus reiserfs versus
xfs:







view thread (173+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <BFA79BE3.14369%llonergan@greenplum.com>
Permalink:  ../BFA79BE3.14369%25llonergan@greenplum.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/BFA79BE3.14369%llonergan@greenplum.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: llonergan@greenplum.com, stange@rentec.com, gsstark@mit.edu, pg@fastcrypt.com, icub3d@gmail.com
  Subject: Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (
  In-Reply-To: <BFA79BE3.14369%llonergan@greenplum.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox