pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laurence Parry <greenreaper@hotmail.com>
To: obartunov@gmail.com
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Workaround: Planner preference for tsquery filter vs. GIN index in fast text search
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2014 00:44:34 -0500
Message-ID: <BLU178-DS9720D392424599507271CA55F0@phx.gbl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAF4Au4w_th88hf9STrjATX1EW9w5xzjGXN8Mxar_E=2qc3JJcw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BLU178-DS1116AC5CC07E7D50A4589CA55F0@phx.gbl>
	<CAF4Au4w_th88hf9STrjATX1EW9w5xzjGXN8Mxar_E=2qc3JJcw@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe:  <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-performance>

> btw, 9.4 should be wiser in case of rare+common terms,
> thanks to GIN fast scan feature.

I'll look forward to it! We have a few other GIN indexes . . .

I don't want to misrepresent my impression of Postgres performance; the only 
other case where I've made a significant improvement by tweaking was 
pre-checking a couple of tables with count(*) > 0 before using them against 
several thousand submissions (checking lists of blocked artists and keywords 
against submission details). I've been pleasantly surprised at what it can 
handle, especially after index-only scans came out.

-- 
Laurence "GreenReaper" Parry 



-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance



view thread (6+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <BLU178-DS9720D392424599507271CA55F0@phx.gbl>
Permalink:  ../BLU178-DS9720D392424599507271CA55F0@phx.gbl/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/BLU178-DS9720D392424599507271CA55F0@phx.gbl

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: greenreaper@hotmail.com, obartunov@gmail.com
  Subject: Re: Workaround: Planner preference for tsquery filter vs. GIN index in fast text search
  In-Reply-To: <BLU178-DS9720D392424599507271CA55F0@phx.gbl>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox