From: Luke Lonergan <llonergan@greenplum.com>
To: Miguel <mmiranda@123.com.sv>
To: Vivek Khera <vivek@khera.org>
Cc: Postgresql Performance <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Best OS & Configuration for Dual Xeon w/4GB &
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 12:59:13 -0800
Message-ID: <C04457A1.1F924%llonergan@greenplum.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <441F161D.7010502@123.com.sv>
Miguel,
On 3/20/06 12:52 PM, "Miguel" <mmiranda@123.com.sv> wrote:
> i have a HP dl380 g3 with array 5i controlled (1+0), these are my results
Another "known bad" RAID controller. The Smartarray 5i is horrible on Linux
- this is the first BSD result I've seen.
> Seek times:
> Full stroke: 250 iter in 1.138232 sec = 4.553 msec
> Half stroke: 250 iter in 1.084474 sec = 4.338 msec
These seem OK - are they "access times" or are they actually "seek times"?
Seems like with RAID 10, you should get better by maybe double.
> Transfer rates:
> outside: 102400 kbytes in 2.075984 sec = 49326 kbytes/sec
> middle: 102400 kbytes in 2.100510 sec = 48750 kbytes/sec
> inside: 102400 kbytes in 2.042313 sec = 50139 kbytes/sec
>
>
> is this good enough?
It's pretty slow. How many disk drives do you have?
- Luke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: llonergan@greenplum.com, mmiranda@123.com.sv, vivek@khera.org
Subject: Re: Best OS & Configuration for Dual Xeon w/4GB &
In-Reply-To: <C04457A1.1F924%llonergan@greenplum.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox