From: Luke Lonergan <llonergan@greenplum.com>
To: Gábriel Ákos <akos.gabriel@i-logic.hu>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: count(*) performance
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 10:14:45 -0800
Message-ID: <C04D6B95.20285%llonergan@greenplum.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4428296B.9040505@i-logic.hu>
Gabriel,
On 3/27/06 10:05 AM, "Gábriel Ákos" <akos.gabriel@i-logic.hu> wrote:
> That gave me an idea. I thought that autovacuum is doing it right, but I
> issued a vacuum full analyze verbose , and it worked all the day.
> After that I've tweaked memory settings a bit too (more fsm_pages)
Oops! I replied to your disk speed before I saw this.
The only thing is - you probably don't want to do a "vacuum full", but
rather a simple "vacuum" should be enough.
- Luke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: llonergan@greenplum.com, akos.gabriel@i-logic.hu
Subject: Re: count(*) performance
In-Reply-To: <C04D6B95.20285%llonergan@greenplum.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox