From: Luke Lonergan <llonergan@greenplum.com>
To: jim@contactbda.com, "Simon Dale" <sdale@rm.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Quick Performance Poll
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 07:31:33 -0700
Message-ID: <C06CE955.21E1C%llonergan@greenplum.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060420133326.M88248@contactbda.com>
Jim,
On 4/20/06 6:36 AM, "Jim Buttafuoco" <jim@contactbda.com> wrote:
> The access is very fast when looking for a small subset of the data.
I guess you are not using indexes because building a (non bitmap) index on
6TB on a single machine would take days if not weeks.
So if you are using table partitioning, do you have to refer to each child
table separately in your queries?
- Luke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: llonergan@greenplum.com, sdale@rm.com
Subject: Re: Quick Performance Poll
In-Reply-To: <C06CE955.21E1C%llonergan@greenplum.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox