From: Luke Lonergan <llonergan@greenplum.com>
To: Milen Kulev <makulev@gmx.net>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: XFS filessystem for Datawarehousing -2
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 19:44:20 -0700
Message-ID: <C0F55F94.2B857%llonergan@greenplum.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <014401c6b5b8$98926a20$0a00a8c0@trivadis.com>
Milen,
On 8/1/06 3:19 PM, "Milen Kulev" <makulev@gmx.net> wrote:
> Sorry, forgot to ask:
> What is the recommended/best PG block size for DWH database? 16k, 32k, 64k
> ?
> What hsould be the relation between XFS/RAID stripe size and PG block size ?
We have found that the page size in PG starts to matter only at very high
disk performance levels around 1000MB/s. Other posters have talked about
maintenance tasks improving in performance, but I haven't seen it.
- Luke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: llonergan@greenplum.com, makulev@gmx.net
Subject: Re: XFS filessystem for Datawarehousing -2
In-Reply-To: <C0F55F94.2B857%llonergan@greenplum.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox